How Code Quality, Scalability, and Technology Risk Analysis Can Make or Break an M&A Deal

It starts with a gut feeling. You’re reviewing a promising acquisition target – strong revenue, great team, solid market fit. But when engineers dig into the code? That excitement can vanish fast. I’ve been there. Code quality, scalability, and technology risk aren’t just technical details – they’re the silent forces shaping every tech M&A outcome, determining whether a deal fuels growth or becomes a costly distraction.

Why Technical Due Diligence is Non-Negotiable in M&A

Think of technical due diligence as your reality check. It’s not about paperwork. It’s about uncovering hidden liabilities and validating strategic value that spreadsheets miss. I’ve seen pitch decks shine while the codebase crumbled beneath the surface. In tech, the technical house of cards is real – and it’s always hiding in plain sight.

The Hidden Costs of Poor Code Quality

Picture this: You acquire a SaaS platform with 10 million users. Then you discover most of it runs on legacy code, written in a framework no one uses anymore. Integration? Not 6 months. More like 18 months of firefighting. Your team won’t be building new features – they’ll be duct-taping the old system together. That’s not an acquisition. That’s a project in technical triage.

When I audit, I use a practical code quality checklist:

• Test coverage and automation (75% or higher is a solid baseline)
• Clean, consistent naming and architecture across the codebase
• Active technical debt tracking (Jira tags, SonarQube, etc.)
• Mature code reviews (PR checklists, required approvers)

My personal alarm bell? Code files over 500 lines with minimal testing. This often means the system is a tangled mess – a nightmare to maintain, let alone integrate.

Example: The Monolithic Mess

A few months back, I reviewed a startup with a monolithic backend serving 500K users daily. The code was all in one language, but the architecture was tightly coupled. Every change created unexpected problems. They couldn’t move payment processing without touching user authentication – forcing full system redeploys for tiny updates.

// Bad: Tight coupling in a monolith
class UserService {
  sendEmail(User user) {
    // ...
    PaymentService.charge(user, 10.00);
  }
}

class PaymentService {
  charge(User user, double amount) {
    // ...
    AuthService.updateUserStatus(user, 'active');
  }
}

This kind of design creates ripple effects during integration. A well-designed microservices approach would have allowed teams to work independently, reducing risk and speeding up the process.

Scalability Assessment: The Growth Litmus Test

Scalability isn’t just about handling traffic spikes. It’s about sustainable growth. Can the system handle your growth plans without constant intervention? Can teams scale with it? I’ve seen startups hit 1M users – only to stall because their architecture couldn’t keep up.

Key Scalability Indicators

Last year, I evaluated a fintech company with solid metrics. But their backend relied heavily on one SQL database. During load testing, response times jumped from 200ms to 5 seconds with just 10,000 concurrent users. Not exactly ready for scale.

• Database sharding: In place, or any plan for it?
• Load balancing: Can services scale horizontally?
• Auto-scaling policies: Are cloud resources automated based on actual demand?
• CDN usage: Are static assets served from locations close to users?

One positive sign: They’d already moved to multi-region AWS with read replicas. This reduced latency for users and gave them backup options – crucial for uptime and compliance.

Actionable Takeaway: The 10x Test

Ask the target: “What happens if traffic suddenly hits 10 times your current levels?” If they say “We’ll just scale up the database” or “We’ll add more servers,” be cautious. A truly scalable system has:

• Decoupled services (using message queues, event-driven design)
• Stateless applications (so any server can handle any request)
• Separate paths for database reads and writes

Technology Risk Analysis: The Red Flags That Kill Deals

All tech comes with risk. But some risks can derail the entire deal. I break them down into three buckets: technical, operational, and compliance.

1. Technical Risks

• End-of-life software: Using Node.js 12 (no longer supported) or Python 2.7? Security and maintenance become huge headaches.
• Proprietary dependencies: Custom frameworks or internal libraries that can’t be maintained after the acquisition.
• Single points of failure: One person managing all infrastructure? That’s a disaster waiting to happen.

Example: A target used a custom real-time analytics tool. It worked – but only because one engineer understood its undocumented quirks. When that person left, the system failed for three days. Classic key person risk.

2. Operational Risks

• Manual deployments: Without CI/CD, integration could add six months to the timeline.
• Lack of observability: No logs, monitoring, or alerts? You won’t know when things break.
• Unversioned environments: If production is the only “source of truth,” you’re setting yourself up for problems.

3. Compliance & Security Risks

• Unencrypted PII: Storing personal data in plain text? That’s a fast track to GDPR/HIPAA violations.
• No penetration testing: If they haven’t tested for vulnerabilities, assume they exist.
• License violations: Using GPL code in proprietary software? That could mean giving your code away.

The Green Lights: What a Strong Technical Foundation Looks Like

The good news? Strong technical foundations exist. Look for these signs:

• Well-documented architecture (ADRs, clear diagrams)
• Automated CI/CD with rollback capabilities
• Modular, reusable code with strong test coverage
• Scalable infrastructure (Kubernetes, serverless options)
• Compliance-by-design (data anonymization, audit trails built in)

Case Study: The Turnaround Story

One target had a messy codebase – but the team was already fixing it. They’d:

• Shifted from monolith to microservices
• Brought test coverage to 85%
• Built a disaster recovery plan with recovery time under 15 minutes

We moved forward because the technical trajectory was upward, even if the current state wasn’t perfect. They showed they could improve – and that’s worth a lot.

Actionable Takeaways for M&A Stakeholders

Whether you’re a CTO, investor, or advisor, here’s how to use this in your next deal:

1. Start early: Begin technical due diligence during the LOI phase.
2. Use a scorecard: Rate code quality, scalability, and risk on a 1–10 scale.
3. Talk to engineers: Ask about their biggest pain points, tech debt, and bottlenecks.
4. Stress-test claims: Demand load test reports and recent security audits.
5. Factor in integration cost: Poor tech quality can add 20–50% to the acquisition price.

Conclusion: The Technical Foundation Defines the Deal

In tech M&A, the technology *is* the business. A strong codebase, scalable architecture, and low-risk stack aren’t just details – they’re value drivers. I’ve seen companies pay for impressive-looking metrics, only to face massive integration costs later. But I’ve also seen deals where solid tech foundations enabled fast scaling and market capture.

One thing I’ve learned: undervalued code is rare. If a target’s tech seems too good to be true, investigate further. The market might already reflect the risks – or the rewards. Your job? Find out where the real value truly lies.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• A CTO’s Framework for Identifying Undervalued ‘Dream Coins’ to Influence Strategic Tech Investments – As a CTO, I spend my days connecting tech to business outcomes. But here’s something I’ve learned after two …
• Writing a Technical Book on Coin Collecting Market Dynamics: My Journey from Concept to O’Reilly Publication – I still remember staring at my screen, fingers hovering over the keyboard, wondering: *”Who’s actually going…
• How I Transformed My Expertise in Undervalued High-Value Coins into a $50,000 Online Course – I still remember the first time I held a rare 1804 dollar in my hands—my heart raced. That passion for undervalued, high…