Behind the Scenes: The Hidden Truth About GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent That Nobody Talks About

There are aspects of this issue that most people miss. Let me pull back the curtain on what I’ve learned from years in the trenches as a numismatist.

I’ve graded, photographed, and authenticated countless rare coins. But the 1873 Indian Head Cent in PCGS MS66BN? That’s one with a story most collectors never hear. Behind the slab, there’s a world of subtle details that separate a “good” coin from a “wow” one—details about grading nuances, lighting tricks, and the mysterious territory between Brown (BN), Red-Brown (RB), and Red (RD) designations. And yes, those tiny distinctions can make or break a coin’s value.

The Hidden Grading Nuances of the 1873 Indian Head Cent

When you’re looking at an 1873 Indian Head Cent, know this: it’s a pivotal year for several reasons, and most of them aren’t what you’d expect.

• The Open 3 vs. Closed 3 varieties? Subtle, but they matter—and I’ve seen them trip up even seasoned graders
• The transition from BN to RB is where arguments start (and where I’ve lost sleep over a single coin)
• Surface chatter on the chin and neck? Often misunderstood. I’ve seen collectors panic over what’s actually a minting quirk

The “Chin Chatter” Phenomenon

Let’s talk about Lady Liberty’s chin and neck. That “chatter” you see? In my experience, it’s usually one of three things:

• Evidence of die polishing—a mint process that can actually help a coin’s grade
• Minor contact marks from circulation, nothing serious
• An illusion created by improper lighting—yes, how you photograph it changes everything

Here’s the kicker: what looks like wear in a photo—especially a rushed one—is often just surface texture. The real skill? Telling the difference between die polish lines (which are fine in high grades) and actual wear (which isn’t). I’ve taught this to apprentices for years, and it still trips them up.

The BN vs. RB Conundrum

This is where things get personal. The BN/RB line? It’s a gray area, and Third Party Graders have their own thresholds. The 1873 Indian Head Cent is a nightmare here because:

• The original mint luster oxidizes unevenly—thanks to that alloy mix from the 1800s
• Environmental factors tone certain spots faster, creating wild color shifts
• Photos? They lie. I can’t tell you how many times a coin looks one shade on screen and another in my hand

My trick? Hunt for the “Red Halo”—that faint ring of original red around Liberty’s hair and the wreath leaves. Spot that in person or in a high-quality photo, and you’re looking at a coin that leans RB, even if most of it looks brown. I’ve bought coins this way and seen their value jump overnight.

The Lighting and Photography Secrets That Affect Grading

Lighting isn’t just about making a coin look pretty. It’s about revealing the truth—or hiding it. After testing dozens of setups, I’ve learned this the hard way.

Why Ring Lights Fail for Coin Photography

Ring lights are everywhere, but they’re problematic. Here’s why:

1. They kill shadows—the very thing that shows depth and detail in the design
2. They make coins look “flat”, which tricks you into thinking the luster is weak when it’s not

My setup? Three 4500K LED lights at 9, 12, and 3 o’clock, angled down at 30-45 degrees. The shadows this creates? They’re gold. They:

• Show luster breaks (a wear sign I check first)
• Expose die polish lines (harmless, actually a good sign)
• Reveal the true color depth without faking it

The TrueView Paradox

PCGS TrueViews are supposed to show the coin as it really is. But in practice? They’re a mixed bag:

• They often use enhanced lighting that cranks up the red
• Background removal can flatten toning gradients, hiding subtle shifts
• Sometimes they overcorrect for common grading biases

For 1873 Indian Head Cents, I’ve noticed TrueViews tend to overdo the red, making BN coins look borderline RB/QT. That’s why I always compare both the submitter’s photos AND the TrueView. Trust me, I’ve seen deals go sour because someone skipped this step.

Advanced Considerations for High-Grade Submissions

Thinking about submitting an 1873 Indian Head Cent for grading? Here are the behind-the-scenes tricks I’ve picked up—the ones I share with my closest collector friends.

Timing Your Submission

Grading services have what I jokingly call “grading fatigue.” After a pile of coins, graders get picky. To game this:

• Submit in slow seasons—January and July are my go-to months
• Use express service—fewer coins means more time per coin
• Bundle with similar-era coins so graders have context

The “LCS Test”

Before I submit, I do the “LCS test”—Local Coin Shop test:

1. Show the coin to 3 different shops
2. Ask their grade estimate AND offer
3. If all three offer MS64+ money for a coin I think is MS66 quality? That’s my cue to submit

Surface Disturbance Blind Spot

Here’s a secret: PCGS graders are trained to ignore minor stuff. For an 1873 Indian Head Cent, they’ll typically:

• Shrug off tiny field scratches if they don’t break luster
• See die polish marks as a plus, not a minus
• Discount light contact marks on high-relief areas like the chin

This is why the MS66BN coin in question got that grade. Those “disturbances” in the field? Likely die polish or light handling that doesn’t hurt eye appeal. I’ve seen graders roll their eyes at collectors who obsess over these.

The “In-Hand” vs. “In-Photo” Reality

Nothing kills a deal faster than a coin that looks amazing online and disappointing in person. For the 1873 Indian Head Cent, this disconnect is real.

What Photos Can’t Capture

No photo—no matter how good—shows you:

• The 3D punch of the strike
• The luster quality—how it flows, rotates, feels
• The true color gradient from center to rim

Countless times, I’ve had a coin look “meh” in photos and “wow” in my hand. This is especially true for BN coins, where the microscopic color shifts in the patina create a depth that’s almost impossible to photograph. I keep a loupe beside my camera for a reason.

The “Juicing” Trap

Beware photos that look “too good.” “Juicing” usually means:

• Overdone color saturation—making a BN look RB
• Excessive sharpening—creating fake detail
• Fake lighting that hides flaws

For serious evaluation, I prioritize photos with neutral white balance and natural shadows. If a photo looks “perfect,” I’m already suspicious. I’ve turned down deals because of this.

Conclusion: The Unseen Factors That Make or Break a High-Grade 1873 IHC

The MS66BN 1873 Indian Head Cent’s journey taught me these hard-won lessons:

1. Grading isn’t just about condition—it’s about context. Know what graders prioritize
2. Lighting and photography aren’t fluff—they’re make-or-break skills
3. The BN/RB line is blurry—learn the “Red Halo” and other subtle clues
4. What looks like wear in photos may not be in hand—always, always check in person
5. Grading services have quirks—understand their blind spots and preferences

The real takeaway? The coin that “sells” isn’t necessarily the most perfect one. It’s the one that balances eye appeal, technical merit, and market expectations. And that balance? That’s where the real magic of numismatics lives. It’s not about the coin—it’s about the story behind the coin. And now, you’re part of it.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide to Understanding 1873 Indian Head Cent Grading – New to coin collecting? Let’s talk about the 1873 Indian Head Cent — a standout piece in American numismatics. This guid…
• How I Solved the GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent Grading and Lighting Challenge (Step-by-Step Guide) – I hit this exact wall with my 1873 Indian Head Cent—and after trial, error, and way too many bad photos, I cracked the c…
• The Complete Beginner’s Guide to the 1804 Dollar: Unlocking the Mystery of the Newly Discovered James A. Stack Coin – So you’ve heard whispers about the 1804 Dollar — maybe from a podcast, a coin show, or a late-night rabbit hole online. …