Why Tech Companies Must Treat Software Bugs Like Rare Coin Errors (And How It Lowers Insurance Premiums)

For tech companies, managing development risks is key to controlling costs, including insurance premiums. Here’s an analysis of how adopting modern tools can reduce bugs, prevent data breaches, and make your company more insurable.

The Hidden Risks of Software “Mint Errors”

In the world of rare coins, a “transitional mint error” like the hypothetical 1946 Jefferson nickel made on a wartime planchet is a rare, costly mistake. But in software development, we produce similar “mint errors” daily—bugs, security flaws, and design oversights that cost far more than misprinted metal. The difference? Tech companies don’t just collect these errors; they ship them to customers, regulators, and insurers.

As a tech risk and insurance advisor, I’ve seen how software “mint errors” directly impact three critical areas:

• Cybersecurity: Unpatched vulnerabilities become breach vectors
• Liability: Bugs in financial/healthcare software trigger regulatory fines
• Insurability: Underwriters charge more (or deny coverage) for companies with poor quality controls

The Coin Collector’s Diagnostic vs. Software Testing

Coin experts use specific tests to verify authenticity:

• Magnet test: Wartime silver nickels aren’t magnetic; regular nickels aren’t either (a common misconception)
• Weight verification: All nickels weigh 5g, regardless of composition
• Visual inspection: Silver has a distinct coloration

Tech companies need an analogous framework for software quality:

// Automated "magnet test" equivalent: CI/CD pipeline with security scanning
pipeline {
  agent any
  stages {
    stage('Security Scan') {
      steps {
        sh 'trivy fs --security-checks vuln .'
        sh 'bandit -r src/' // Python security linter
      }
    }
    stage('Visual QA') {
      steps {
        sh 'cypress run --spec "**/critical-path-tests/*"'
      }
    }
  }
}

Why “Just a Regular Nickel” Won’t Cut It in Modern Tech

A 1946 nickel mistaken for a rare error is still worth 5 cents. But in software, the “regular” version of your product might contain:

• Undetected race conditions causing intermittent failures
• Data leakage through caching layers
• Third-party dependency vulnerabilities (Log4j-style)

The Cost of Ignoring “Mint Errors”

Consider these real-world parallels:

• A weight discrepancy in coin collecting = missing input validation in code
• Surface discoloration indicating fake silver = unusual error rates in production
• Magnetism tests for authenticity = OWASP ZAP scans for security flaws

“The most expensive software bug isn’t the rare one—it’s the common one that becomes systemic.” — Tech Risk White Paper, 2023

Insurance Underwriter’s Perspective: What They Actually Check

When I work with underwriters to secure cyber insurance for tech firms, they don’t care about your tech stack—they care about risk mitigation. Here’s what they verify:

1. Proactive Bug Prevention (Not Just Detection)

• Automated testing: 80%+ coverage of business-critical paths
• Static analysis: SonarQube, Semgrep in CI/CD
• Composition analysis: Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)

2. Enterprise Software Stability Metrics

• Mean time to recovery (MTTR): Under 2 hours for critical incidents
• Defect escape rate: Bugs found in production vs. testing
• Rollback frequency: Production deploys requiring reversal

3. Cybersecurity Hygiene

• Patch management: 90%+ critical vulnerabilities patched within 30 days
• Architecture reviews: Documented threat modeling for high-risk components
• Incident response: IR playbook tested quarterly

Actionable Risk Reduction Framework

Here’s how to turn “fumbling around” (like our coin collector) into a strategic risk-mitigation approach:

Step 1: Implement “Magnet Test”-Style Checks

• Security: Daily dependency scanning via npm audit or dependabot
• Stability: Chaos engineering with tools like Gremlin
• Data integrity: Automated reconciliation jobs matching internal/external records

Step 2: Build a “Coin Grading” Process (But for Software)

• PCGS equivalent: Third-party penetration testing annually
• Weight verification: Load testing with production-like datasets
• Visual inspection: Automated visual regression testing (e.g., Percy)

Step 3: Avoid “Wasteful Submissions”

Our coin collector wasted money sending a common nickel for verification. Similarly, tech teams waste resources on:

• Penetration testing: Without first fixing known vulnerabilities
• Vendor assessments: Without internal self-audits
• Compliance certifications: Without process alignment

Cybersecurity: The “Magnetic Attraction” for Breach Actors

Just as the coin collector learned magnets don’t distinguish wartime nickels, many tech teams use ineffective security controls:

• Firewalls: Won’t stop API-based attacks
• Antivirus: Useless against zero-day exploits
• Password policies: Don’t prevent phishing

Modern “Non-Magnetic” Protection

• API security: Schema validation + rate limiting
• Zero trust: BeyondCorp-style device/user verification
• Behavioral monitoring: UEBA for anomalous activity

Liability Shield: The “Wear and Tear” of Software

The original coin was criticized for excessive wear after only a decade. Similarly, software “wear” manifests as:

• Technical debt: Unmaintained dependencies
• Unpatched systems: Windows Server 2012 still in production
• Legacy code: Unclear ownership, undocumented behavior

Preventing Digital “Corrosion”

• Automated tech debt tracking: LinearB, Jellyfish
• Deprecation policies: 3-year sunset for major versions
• Knowledge retention: Architecture decision records (ADRs)

Conclusion: Minting Better Software (And Lowering Premiums)

Just as the coin collector learned to trust human expertise over AI, tech leaders must prioritize:

1. Proactive quality: Build “minting error” detection into development, not as a final step
2. Third-party verification: Use external audits strategically, not reactively
3. Continuous improvement: Treat software like rare coins—some flaws are valuable “varieties” we learn from, not just mistakes

The result? Insurers recognize your disciplined approach with:

• 5-15% lower cyber insurance premiums
• Better terms for E&O (errors and omissions) coverage
• Higher confidence during regulatory audits

Remember: In tech, we don’t mint coins—but we do create value. And just like rare coins, the quality of our “minting” process determines what that value truly is.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Is AI-Powered Numismatics the High-Income Skill Developers Should Learn Next? – The tech skills that command the highest salaries? They’re always shifting. I recently dug into whether AI-powered…
• Legal & Compliance Implications of AI Misinformation: Lessons from a 1946 Jefferson Nickel – Let’s talk about something that keeps legal tech developers up at night: what happens when AI gets it wrong? I rec…
• How I Built a SaaS Product Using Lean Startup Principles: A Founder’s Guide to Validating Ideas Without Wasting Time or Money – Building a SaaS product isn’t about chasing perfection. It’s about solving real problems for real people — f…