Is Coin Grading and Authentication the High-Income Skill Developers Should Learn Next?
October 1, 2025Enterprise Integration Done Right: How to Scale Your Tech Stack Like a Pro
October 1, 2025Tech companies know bugs are expensive. But here’s what many miss: **those bugs also drive up your insurance premiums.** It’s not just about fixing errors—it’s about how your entire development process shapes your risk profile (and your insurance bill).
Why Software Quality Affects Your Insurance Bill
Insurance underwriters aren’t just looking at your revenue or product features anymore. They’re scrutinizing your code. Why? Because **a buggy, insecure codebase is a ticking time bomb for liability claims, data breaches, and downtime**—all of which mean payouts for insurers.
From my work with tech teams and insurers, I’ve seen it time and again: **the quality of your software directly impacts your insurability and costs.** Stable, secure, well-tested code doesn’t just delight users—it signals lower risk. That’s what insurers want to see. Lower risk means lower premiums on cyber, professional liability, and errors-and-omissions (E&O) coverage.
What Underwriters Actually Care About
When an insurer evaluates your tech company, they’re not asking, “How fast can you ship?” They’re asking, “How likely are you to break something—or get hacked?” They’ll check:
- How often do bugs slip into production?
- Do you have automated testing and code scanning?
- Is security part of your development process, or an afterthought?
- How fast do you patch critical vulnerabilities?
- Are you using CI/CD with quality gates?
<
<
Answering “yes” to these isn’t just good practice—it’s a discount on your insurance. Firms with strong, automated testing and code analysis often see **30–50% lower premiums** on cyber and E&O policies.
How Smarter Development Tools Cut Bugs—And Premiums
Writing code fast is easy. Writing code that *works* and *stays secure*? That’s where the real savings start. The right tools don’t just catch bugs—they prevent the kinds of incidents that lead to insurance claims.
1. Static Code Analysis: Catch Bugs Before They Run
Tools like SonarQube, CodeQL, and Semgrep analyze code **before it’s deployed**, spotting security flaws, logic errors, and anti-patterns. Think of it as a spell-check for vulnerabilities.
Try this: Add SAST to your CI/CD pipeline. Here’s a simple GitHub Actions setup:
 name: SAST Scan
 on: [push, pull_request]
 jobs:
 scan:
 runs-on: ubuntu-latest
 steps:
 - uses: actions/checkout@v3
 - name: Run CodeQL
 uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v2
 with:
 languages: javascript, python
 
Insurers notice. Teams using SAST consistently report **fewer security claims**—and pay less because of it.
2. Dynamic Testing: Simulate Real Attacks
DAST tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite test your live app, mimicking how hackers attack. They find issues SAST misses—like injection flaws or broken authentication.
Tip: Run DAST in staging every week or after big updates. Share the results (redacted) with your insurer during renewal. It shows you’re proactive, not reactive.
3. Automated Testing: Stability That Speaks Louder Than Words
Test coverage isn’t just for QA—it’s a risk signal. Teams with 80%+ coverage are far less likely to ship critical bugs.
Real-world example: A fintech client boosted test coverage from 40% to 85% using Jest and PyTest>. Result? Their E&O premium dropped **22% in a year**.
4. CI/CD: Smoother Releases, Fewer Surprises
Manual deployments? Risky. A CI/CD pipeline with mandatory tests, linting, and security checks means fewer human errors and more consistent releases.
Key move: Block merges until all tests and scans pass. That “gate” tells insurers: we’re predictable, not chaotic.
Cybersecurity: The Non-Negotiable for Insurability
Cyber insurance isn’t optional. Breaches and ransomware are the top reasons tech firms file claims. Underwriters want proof you’re serious about security—not just hopes and prayers.
Secure Coding: Train, Then Automate
Start with OWASP guidelines. Then use tools like ESLint with security rules to block risky code—like eval() or innerHTML in JavaScript.
Teach your team why these rules matter. It’s not bureaucracy—it’s damage control.
Dependencies: The Hidden Risk in Your Code
Third-party libraries are a favorite attack path. Tools like Snyk, Dependabot, or npm audit scan for known vulnerabilities.
Smart move: Generate a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) with Syft or SPDX. Share it with insurers. It proves you know what’s in your software—and that you’re managing the risks.
Patching: Speed Matters
Underwriters ask: *How fast do you fix critical flaws?* If Log4Shell happened last week and you’re still vulnerable, your risk score spikes.
Best practice: Automate critical patches. Track how long it takes to fix CVEs. Show that data during underwriting.
Stability: The Insurer’s Secret Benchmark
Insurers care about **uptime, data integrity, and recovery**. Downtime and data loss aren’t just user frustrations—they’re liability risks.
Monitoring: See Problems Before They Escalate
Use Datadog, New Relic, or Prometheus to track performance, errors, and uptime. Set alerts for critical failures.
Pro tip: Keep a record of your uptime (e.g., 99.95% monthly). It’s solid evidence of reliability.
Backups and Recovery: Plan for the Worst
Insurers want proof that you can restore data fast. Use automated, encrypted backups (try Veeam or Backblaze) and test recovery quarterly.
Run a mock disaster drill. It shows you’re prepared—not panicked.
How to Talk to Insurers (Without Selling Your Soul)
When you apply for or renew coverage, **show, don’t just tell**. Insurers want evidence, not buzzwords.
- Share your CI/CD pipeline diagram.
- Give them test coverage reports.
- Include redacted SAST/DAST scan results.
- Show uptime stats and patching timelines.
- Hand over your SBOM and incident response plan.
"We’ve seen clients cut premiums by 15–30% just by documenting their development practices. It’s not magic—it’s transparency." – Tech Risk & Insurance Advisor
Better Code, Better Coverage, Better Costs
Writing secure, stable software isn’t just about user satisfaction. It’s about **reducing risk—and that directly lowers your insurance costs.** From my experience with tech teams, the ones that focus on:
-  <
- Automated code scanning and testing
- Security built into development
- Clear documentation of their processes
- Reliable uptime and recovery plans
end up with fewer claims, lower premiums, and stronger insurer relationships. This isn’t just development hygiene—it’s a financial strategy. Build software that’s made to last, and insurers will reward you for it.
Related Resources
You might also find these related articles helpful:
- Is Coin Grading and Authentication the High-Income Skill Developers Should Learn Next? - Tech salaries keep climbing—but the skills that land them keep changing. After years of watching devs chase the same hot...
- Legal Tech Insights: Navigating Compliance and Data Privacy at Numismatic Trade Shows - Let’s talk about something most tech folks at numismatic trade shows rarely do: legal and compliance tech. But here’s th...
- How I Built a SaaS Product Around a Niche Event: Lessons from the Great American Coin Show - Building a SaaS product from scratch is equal parts excitement and uncertainty. I took the leap with a platform tailored...

