A CTO’s Framework for Identifying Undervalued ‘Dream Coins’ to Influence Strategic Tech Investments

As a CTO, I spend my days connecting tech to business outcomes. But here’s something I’ve learned after two decades in the field: the best technology investments often look like they don’t make sense—at first.

The conversation about undervalued “dream coins” in numismatics actually teaches us a lot about spotting overlooked tech opportunities, hiring the right talent, and planning infrastructure investments. When rare coins get mispriced, it’s usually because people miss supply constraints, new demand sources, or the story behind them. Sound familiar? The same thing happens with emerging tech all the time. In this post, I’m mapping what I’ve learned from coin collectors to real-world tech leadership—no fluff, just what works.

Reframing ‘Undervaluation’ in the Context of Strategic Technology Leadership

When collectors talk about “undervalued” coins, they’re actually asking: Where can we find outsized returns based on supply limits, demand changes, and compelling stories? That’s exactly the question I ask when evaluating new tech.

Take what happened last year. We looked at a niche cloud orchestration tool with a small but technical following. While everyone defaulted to the big names, we noticed something: this tool got our hybrid cloud deployments done 40% faster. The developer adoption (the “population”) was modest, but its actual performance in our environment (the “grade”) was exceptional.

We tested it with three engineers, put in a small budget, and saved $250K annually in compute costs. Even better? That internal expertise gave us real leverage with our main cloud vendor. Sometimes the quiet solutions speak the loudest.

Demand, Supply, and Condition Rarity: The Tech Equivalent

In coin collecting, how many were made versus how many survive in top condition creates wild value swings. A coin with 10,000 minted copies seems common—until you learn only 50 exist in MS-65+ grade. Suddenly, it’s rare.

In tech, the same math applies. Market size versus performance for your exact stack tells the real story. A low-code platform with 100,000 users might look appealing—but if it can’t connect to your legacy ERP, it’s functionally “low-grade” for your needs.

We found this out when evaluating AI observability tools. The market leader had more users, but a smaller tool with 5,000 users fit our MLOps pipeline perfectly. We didn’t pick it because it was popular. We picked it because it was the right tool for our specific problems. In tech, “condition rarity” matters more than market share.

The Substitution Effect: When Markets Shift, So Should Your Tech Bets

A collector friend once told me: when gold prices jump, smart buyers look at alternatives like Morgan Silver Dollars. That’s the substitution effect—and it’s crucial for tech budgeting.

When AWS costs climbed 35% last year, we didn’t just ask for discounts. We asked: What “silver dollar” option gives us similar capabilities at lower cost?

We moved 30% of our non-critical workloads to a regional cloud provider. These workloads needed low latency for Asia-Pacific users, and the regional option delivered 50% better response times. The essential features (the “key dates”) worked just fine. The savings let us hire two senior engineers. The market priced AWS like a “gold” asset, but we found value in the regional “silver” option by understanding our actual constraints.

Building a Tech Roadmap Around ‘Shipwreck Hoards’ and Narrative Potential

Another collector mentioned coins salvaged from sunken ships—not just valuable for their rarity, but for their history. In tech, we look for infrastructure with stories: open-source projects gaining momentum, aging systems with modernization potential, or new technologies with compelling backgrounds.

Case Study: The ‘SS Central America’ of Our Data Pipeline

We inherited a monolithic data warehouse built in the early 2010s. Most would see it as a cost center. We saw it as a treasure chest.

Our team:

• Reviewed the database structure and found unique customer behavior datasets (our “rare gems”)
• Built a simple API layer to share these insights with product teams
• Used revenue from a new analytics feature to fund our cloud migration

That 15-year history became a selling point with clients who needed long-term data. We didn’t just cut costs—we turned a perceived weakness into something that made us stand out. Some of our best tech assets come from places others overlook.

Code: Evaluating Narrative Potential in Open-Source Projects

When we look at emerging tech, we use this simple scoring system:

def calculate_narrative_score(project):
    score = 0
    # Supply: Small but engaged community
    if project.stars < 5000 and fork_count > 100:
        score += 3  # Few users but many forks show interest
    # Demand: Fits our plans
    if project.repo_name in ['kubernetes', 'llama3', 'dub']:
        score += 2  # Matches our roadmap
    # Narrative: Origin and future plans
    if 'ai' in project.description and '2024' in project.roadmap:
        score += 5  # Timely and forward-looking
    # Risk: Stable and diverse team
    if len(project.contributors) > 10 and project.last_commit < 30:
        score += 2  # Multiple maintainers, recent updates
    return score

We focus on projects scoring 8+. Last year, we added a real-time database few had heard of. It came from MIT IoT research. The user count was modest, but the story—"built for edge computing"—matched our IoT expansion perfectly. Sometimes the right solution finds you when you're looking beyond the mainstream.

Budget Allocation: The 'CAC Stickered' Principle in Tech Hiring

Coin collectors trust CAC (Certified Acceptance Corporation) stickers—third-party verification of quality. In hiring, we apply the same idea.

We don't just want "5 years of AWS" on a resume. We look for:

• Recognized certifications (like AWS Certified Solutions Architect, not just "used AWS")
• Actual open-source contributions (commits to well-maintained projects)
• Proof of solving real problems (LeetCode rankings, architecture diagrams in portfolios)

Last year, we hired a senior engineer who'd built an open-source tool for cloud cost forecasting. Few had this skill, but their impact was clear. We paid 20% above market rate—and recouped that investment in less than 12 months when they cut our infrastructure costs by $400K. Third-party validation in hiring pays off.

Actionable Takeaway: The 'Dream Coin' Budget Allocation Framework

We keep 15% of our tech budget for "dream coin" opportunities—high-risk, high-reward bets on undervalued assets:

• 10% for new technologies (AI agents, quantum computing tools)
• 3% for infrastructure "treasure chests" (modernizing legacy systems)
• 2% for talent with verified skills (niche certifications, quality open-source work)

If 2 out of 10 bets succeed, they pay for the other 8. The key is finding where most people aren't looking—but where real value exists.

Managing Engineering Teams: The 'Circle of Competence' Mandate

A collector once told me: "Stay within what you know well." That's essential for tech teams, too. Focus on what you do better than anyone else.

Every quarter, we review our team's strengths using a simple matrix:

We invest in skills where we're strong and where they matter (like Kubernetes). For high-value skills where we're still building expertise (like AI/ML), we train internally or partner with specialists. And we avoid skills with high costs but little future use (like COBOL), even if they're rare in the market. Focus matters more than chasing every trend.

The CTO's Playbook for 'Undervalued' Tech Assets

The coin market rewards those who look beyond the obvious—to supply, demand, and story. The tech world works the same way. As a CTO, here's what guides my decisions:

1. Prioritize performance fit over market size—choose tools that solve your specific challenges, not just the popular ones.
2. Be ready to substitute—when "gold" options (AWS, premium SaaS) get too expensive, find "silver" alternatives with similar capabilities.
3. Look for compelling backgrounds—invest in tech with stories that match your roadmap (open-source origins, academic research).
4. Verify skills rigorously—focus on third-party validation, not just resume keywords.
5. Stay in your expertise zone—double down on what your team does best, and build partnerships for everything else.

The next time someone questions why you're investing in that "niche" tool or hiring someone with unconventional experience, remember: true value often hides in plain sight. The best tech assets aren't the ones everyone wants. They're the ones most people don't even see.

Like a rare coin sitting in an overlooked auction lot, your next big breakthrough might be waiting in places no one else is looking. The smartest tech leaders don't follow the crowd—they find where the crowd isn't looking. That's where we're building our next legacy.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Writing a Technical Book on Coin Collecting Market Dynamics: My Journey from Concept to O’Reilly Publication - I still remember staring at my screen, fingers hovering over the keyboard, wondering: *”Who’s actually going...
• How I Transformed My Expertise in Undervalued High-Value Coins into a $50,000 Online Course - I still remember the first time I held a rare 1804 dollar in my hands—my heart raced. That passion for undervalued, high...
• How to Leverage Rare Tech Assets to Command $200+/Hr Consulting Rates - Want to charge $200+ per hour as a tech consultant? It’s not about working harder. It’s about solving the right problems...