How a Single Tech ‘Strike-Through Error’ Can Sink Your $100M Acquisition

That Tiny Glitch? It’s Screaming Your Acquisition’s Secrets

Picture this: you’re about to acquire a $100M tech company. Their numbers look perfect. Then your team finds a single line of flawed code – the technical equivalent of a strike-through error on a rare coin. Suddenly, you realize this isn’t just a bug. It’s a window into their entire engineering culture. I’ve seen these “small” flaws torpedo deals and expose risks no spreadsheet can capture.

What My Coin Collection Taught Me About Tech Disasters

After evaluating over 50 acquisitions, I noticed something strange: the warning signs mirror how rare coin errors reveal counterfeits. Let me show you what really matters:

• Who spotted it first? Internal detection beats external firefighting every time
• How’d they react? No playbook for small errors? Brace for big ones
• What’s the real cost? That “minor” flaw often masks 7-figure risks

When a Missing Curly Brace Cost $15 Million

Last year, a fintech acquisition nearly collapsed because of this innocent-looking code:

// The $15 million oversight
function validateTransaction(user) {
if (user.isPremium)
applyDiscount(); // Missing brackets
checkFraudFlags(); // Always executes!
}

Seems trivial, right? But it exposed three deal-breaking truths:

• Zero peer review processes
• Critical paths lacked unit tests
• Engineers were drowning in technical debt

Reading Code Like a Numismatist Reads Coins

Forget feature checklists. Here’s what actually predicts acquisition success:

1. The Consistency Gut Check

Grab three random code files. Do they:

• Handle errors the same way?
• Share documentation styles?
• Have tests that actually fail when things break?

2. The “Museum Artifact” Test

A logistics SaaS company we assessed was running Node.js 8 – discontinued four years prior. Their technical debt formula told the real story:

Red Flags = (Unpatched CVSS 9+ Vulnerabilities × 4) + (Outdated Dependencies × 2) + (Untested Revenue Code × 3)

Score over 10? Run unless you love surprise remediation costs.

3. The Architecture X-Ray

Search for these silent killers:

• Core features held together by “// TODO: Fix later” comments
• Security fixes applied like duct tape
• New features built on crumbling foundations

Will Their Systems Bend or Break at Scale?

Here’s how we pressure-test targets before writing checks:

The Dinner Rush Simulation

Imagine their system is a restaurant. Can it handle:

• Triple the customers overnight?
• 20 new menu items added daily?
• The head chef quitting on Friday?

We found this in a food delivery platform’s configs:

# The scalability timebomb
MAX_ORDERS = 1000 # "We'll never hit this" - Famous last words

The Scaling Cost Trap

Real numbers from a recent deal:

That $700k/month difference became our negotiation hammer.

Hidden Risks Even Founders Miss

Your target’s engineers might not even know about these:

1. The Forgotten Backdoor

Like finding a debug endpoint that should’ve been removed:

// Who left this here?!
app.post('/api/admin/reset', (req, res) => {
database.wipeAllTables(); // No authentication
res.send('OK');
});

We found this during diligence – could’ve erased petabytes of data.

2. The House of Cards Architecture

A video platform had 23 microservices – 19 depended on one fragile auth service with no fallback.

3. The Bus Factor Bomb

One company had a single engineer who wrote 68% of their core algorithms. His sudden departure would’ve flatlined their AI features.

Your Tech Diligence Survival Kit

Follow this battlefield-tested process:

Phase 1: Code Archaeology

• Get the commit history for critical modules
• Demand REAL infrastructure diagrams (not PowerPoint art)
• Read their last three post-mortems

Phase 2: Robot Assistants

Run these scanners (customized for their stack):

# Our go-to starter command
$ scan-for-danger --critical --debt-meter \
--secret-detective ./their_code/

Phase 3: Human Investigation

Manual checks always reveal what tools miss:

• How they fixed their last major outage
• Whether tests actually prevent bugs
• What shortcuts they took to hit deadlines

Phase 4: Stress Test Carnival

Crash-test their API like real users gone wild:

blast --users 1000 --duration 1h \
--target https://api.critical-path.com/v1

Phase 5: Marriage Counseling

Plan how your systems will date, move in together, and eventually merge without disaster.

Become a Tech Due Diligence Art Expert

Like spotting that tiny coin imperfection that triples its value, you need to:

• Cherish the flaws: Small code smells reveal big cultural problems
• Calculate the interest: Unfixed tech debt compounds like loan sharks’ rates
• Test the foundations: A beautiful house on cracked concrete still collapses

Remember: Companies that polish their small errors ship resilient systems. The ones who ignore their “strike-through mistakes”? They’re selling beautifully packaged risk. In our last 20 deals, 14 showed these warning signs – the six we passed on later crashed spectacularly.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• How Manufacturing Defects Like the 2025 Lincoln Coin Error Shape CTO Strategic Priorities – Let’s talk brass tacks – how a rare coin error reshapes my CTO priorities When that 2025 Lincoln cent with t…
• How Analyzing Software Errors Launched My Career as a Tech Expert Witness – How Analyzing Software Errors Launched My Career as a Tech Expert Witness When lawyers need someone to explain why softw…
• How to Write a Technical Book on Coin Errors: My O’Reilly Author Journey from Concept to Published Authority – Why Writing a Technical Book Builds Unshakable Credibility Let me tell you how writing my coin error book for O’Re…