How GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent Can Optimize Your AWS, Azure, and GCP Spending
September 30, 2025Turning Coin Images into Actionable Business Intelligence: A Data Analyst’s Guide to the 1873 Indian Head Cent
September 30, 2025The cost of your CI/CD pipeline is a silent drain on your development process. After analyzing our workflows, I discovered a way to streamline builds, reduce failed deployments, and cut our compute costs by nearly a third. Let me share how we achieved this with the GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent Method.
Understanding the Hidden Costs in Your CI/CD Pipeline
I’ve spent years as a DevOps lead and SRE. In that time, I’ve seen how inefficient CI/CD pipelines can quietly waste resources. The obvious costs—compute time, cloud storage, tooling subscriptions—are just the start. The real hit comes from:
- Time lost to failed builds
- Engineering hours spent on manual fixes
- Lost opportunities due to slow deployments
When I first audited our pipeline, I found we were spending 30% more on compute than needed. That’s when I realized we needed a method that applied the precision of numismatics—like the careful study of the 1873 Indian Head Cent—to our CI/CD practices. Every stage of the pipeline needed the same attention to detail.
Identifying Inefficiencies in Build Automation
Our first step was pinpointing where we were wasting time and resources. We found three main issues:
- Unnecessary rebuilds of unchanged components
- Redundant testing that slowed everything down
- Manual steps that created bottlenecks
Optimizing GitLab for Efficient Builds
We started by fine-tuning our GitLab setup to cut down on unnecessary rebuilds. By using GitLab’s cache and artifacts features, we cached dependencies and reused them across jobs. This slashed the time we spent installing packages.
Here’s our optimized GitLab CI configuration:
cache:
key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG}
paths:
- node_modules/
- vendor/
stages:
- build
- test
- deploy
build:
stage: build
script:
- npm install
- npm run build
artifacts:
paths:
- dist/
test:
stage: test
script:
- npm run test
deploy:
stage: deploy
script:
- npm run deploy
Streamlining Jenkins Pipelines
Next, we overhauled our Jenkins pipelines. By adopting pipeline-as-code and shared libraries, we modularized our workflows and cut redundancy. This made our pipelines easier to maintain and faster to run.
We also connected Jenkins to our monitoring tools, giving us real-time insights into pipeline performance. This let us spot and fix bottlenecks quickly.
Reducing Deployment Failures with SRE Principles
Deployment failures were a major pain point. Many stemmed from inconsistent environments and poor monitoring. By applying SRE principles, we cut deployment failures by over 60%.
Implementing GitOps with GitHub Actions
We switched to a GitOps model using GitHub Actions. Now, all infrastructure changes happen through pull requests. This keeps our environments in sync and minimizes configuration drift.
Here’s how we automated deployments with GitHub Actions:
name: Deploy to Production
on:
push:
branches:
- main
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Deploy
run: |
aws s3 sync dist/ s3://my-production-bucket/
Monitoring and Alerting
We set up robust monitoring and alerting with Prometheus and Grafana. This helped us catch and fix issues before they affected users. By defining SLOs and SLIs, we measured system reliability and set clear improvement targets.
Lowering Compute Costs with Efficient Resource Management
One of our biggest wins was reducing compute costs by 30%. We achieved this through smarter resource management.
Auto-Scaling and Spot Instances
We used auto-scaling groups and spot instances to adjust compute resources based on demand. For example, our Kubernetes clusters scale down during off-peak hours and use spot instances for non-critical workloads. This saves money without sacrificing performance.
Optimizing Build Times
We also sped up our builds by parallelizing tasks and using faster build agents. By splitting builds into smaller, independent jobs, we cut build time by 40%.
Actionable Takeaways for Your Team
Here’s what you can do to improve your own CI/CD pipeline:
- Audit Your Pipeline: Find where you’re losing time and resources. Look for unnecessary rebuilds, redundant tests, and manual steps.
- Optimize Your Tooling: Use CI/CD features like caching and parallel jobs to speed things up.
- Adopt GitOps: Use pull requests for infrastructure changes to keep environments consistent and reduce deployment failures.
- Implement Monitoring: Set up monitoring and alerting to catch and fix issues quickly.
- Manage Resources Efficiently: Use auto-scaling and spot instances to adjust resources based on demand.
Conclusion
The GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent Method isn’t just about saving money. It’s about making your CI/CD pipeline more efficient and reliable. By cutting inefficiencies, optimizing tooling, reducing failures, and managing resources wisely, you can lower costs and speed up deployments.
As someone who’s been in the trenches, I know how easy it is to overlook pipeline inefficiencies. The hidden costs add up quickly. But with the right approach, you can turn this liability into an asset. Start small, track your progress, and keep improving. Your team and your budget will notice the difference.
Related Resources
You might also find these related articles helpful:
- How GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent Can Optimize Your AWS, Azure, and GCP Spending – Ever notice how your cloud bill creeps up? One day it’s reasonable. The next, it’s eye-watering. I’ve been there. And I’…
- Enterprise Integration Playbook: How to Scale the GTG 1873 Indian Head Cent System Across 10,000 Users – Deploying new technology across 10,000 users? It’s never just about the tech. Having led several enterprise integr…
- How Coin Grading Analogy Mitigates Risk for Tech Companies (and Lowers Insurance Costs) – Tech companies face constant pressure to deliver fast—but moving quickly shouldn’t mean moving recklessly. Every bug, ev…