My Adventure with the ‘Follow the Lead’ Coin Picture Game
June 21, 2025The Anticipation of Grading: My Experience with the ’86 GTG Morgan Dollar
June 21, 2025Just the other day, I came across a coin that really put my grading skills to the test—a heavily corroded piece that got me thinking hard about how we judge a coin’s condition. PCGS had slabbed it as AG-3 in a straight holder, but something about that grade didn’t sit right with me. So I dug a little deeper, and before I knew it, I was lost in a world of historical tidbits and collector insights.
The Coin That Defied Identification
When I first saw pictures of this coin, I had to laugh—it looked more like a rusty relic than a piece of money. The surface was pitted and worn down, with details so faded that figuring out where it came from felt like solving a mystery. Turns out, it’s probably a Sommer Islands (Bermuda) coin, the kind that turns up in detector finds after being buried in tough soil for hundreds of years. That explains why it’s so beat up. It’s a good reminder that where a coin’s been can totally change how it looks, and that’s why grading is more art than science sometimes.
Grading Controversies and Practical Tips
Seeing PCGS give this coin an AG-3 straight grade really threw me for a loop. With that much non-mint corrosion, I’d expect a details holder. Here’s what I figured out after looking into it:
- Be skeptical of straight grades on damaged coins: If a coin’s got heavy pitting or corrosion that didn’t come from the mint, it probably shouldn’t get a straight grade. I’ve seen coins like this before, and sometimes collectors even send them back for re-holdering.
- Get to know the grading scale: On Dr. Sheldon’s scale, this coin falls below Basal State-1, so an AP (Almost Poor) grade might be more like it. I actually pulled out my own VG-8 1799 cent to compare, and let me tell you, it looked like a million bucks next to this one. Really shows how condition is all relative.
- Consider the coin’s background, but keep your standards high: Coins from places like Bermuda, or ones with a rough history (like those 1799 cents made from planchets that got soaked in seawater), sometimes get graded easier. But don’t let a coin’s rarity blind you to its condition—hold onto your grading standards.
Historical Context and Market Realities
Looking into the history, I remembered how seawater messed up coins like those 1799 cents. The planchets were shipped from England in leaky barrels, so they got corroded even before they were struck. That’s why so many survivors look rough and have weak details. Knowing that helps me understand why some coins are in bad shape, but it’s no excuse for over-grading. As for the market, the guide says this AG-3 Sommer Islands piece is worth $6,500—but honestly, in that condition, I wouldn’t pay more than $100. It just goes to show: always check guide prices against what the coin actually looks like and what collectors are willing to pay.
My Advice for Fellow Collectors
After all this, here’s what I’d tell other collectors: Always take a close look at slabbed coins, especially the beat-up ones. Use history to understand a coin’s condition, but don’t give grading services a free pass. And above all, trust your instincts—if a coin looks too far gone to grade, it probably is. This whole experience reminded me that grading isn’t just about numbers on a label; it’s about keeping our hobby honest.