My Metal Detecting Adventure: Unearthing a 1919 Mercury Dime and Silver Trinkets
July 10, 2025My Revelation on the 1909 VDB 1c Proof – I Had No Idea!
July 10, 2025I recently added a unique nickel to my collection that turned out to be a double whammy of errors—an off-center strike with a subtle double strike—and it’s graded NGC MS-67 PL. This discovery not only thrilled me but also reinforced some key insights about prooflike coins and error grading that I’ll share here.
Discovering the Coin and Its Errors
When I first laid eyes on this nickel, I could immediately spot the off-center strike, which is always a fun find. But upon closer inspection, I noticed a faint double strike too, making it even more special. The real kicker? It’s designated prooflike (PL) by NGC, meaning it has those mirror-like reflective surfaces that catch the light beautifully. This isn’t a proof coin—those are specially made—but rather a regular issue that came out looking pristine due to fresh dies.
Understanding Prooflike Coins and Debunking Myths
As someone who actively collects PL coins, I’ve learned they’re typically among the first few hundred struck with new dies, resulting in high reflectivity without any special handling. What makes this coin a game-changer is the off-center error—it proves that PL surfaces come solely from the die quality, not from preferential treatment of planchets. Here’s why this matters:
- No special planchet care: Errors like this show that even misaligned strikes can produce prooflike finishes, debunking claims that PL coins get extra attention.
- Die freshness is key: PL coins often emerge early in a die’s life, and I’ve seen bags from the mint where many coins look proof-like, especially from the 1990s to early 2000s.
- Rarity adds value: This is my fourth off-center PL coin, and such errors are rare, making them highly sought after in the market for their uniqueness and visual appeal.
Grading Insights for Error Coins
One of the most intriguing aspects was how NGC handled the grading. The coin has no readable date or mint mark, so it’s slabbed as “No Date” in MS-67 PL. This taught me a lot about TPG practices:
- Standard coins vs. errors: For worn coins with unreadable dates, they’re often ungradeable unless they’re unique types. But for error coins like off-center strikes where the date is missing or obliterated, they can still receive a straight grade.
- Market implications: Graded error coins without dates hold solid value because the error itself is the star, and collectors like me appreciate the certification for authenticity and condition.
- Practical tip: Always check for TPG designations on error coins—they add credibility and can boost resale potential, especially with PL details.
Collecting Tips and Broader Observations
Based on my experience, hunting for prooflike error coins can be incredibly rewarding. I focus on nickels from mints like Philadelphia, San Francisco, or Denver in the 1990s–2000s era, where PL examples are more common. Here’s my advice:
- Look for die characteristics: Inspect coins for high reflectivity and sharp strikes, as they’re indicators of early die states.
- Error appreciation: Off-center or double-strike errors not only add visual interest but also serve as educational pieces about minting processes.
- Market trends: PL error coins are gaining popularity, with values often higher than standard issues—keep an eye on auctions for similar slabs.
This prooflike nickel with its “oopsie” errors has become a favorite in my collection, reminding me that numismatics is full of surprises. If you’re into errors or PL coins, dive in—you never know what hidden gems you might uncover!