The Crack-Out Game: Should You Resubmit That NGC-Holdered Coin to PCGS?

Sometimes the plastic holder is holding the coin back. Let’s talk about the risks and rewards of trying to upgrade this piece across grading services.

I’ve been cracking coins out of holders for over two decades now. It’s a practice that separates the bold from the cautious, and when done correctly, it can mean the difference between a coin that sits quietly in your collection and one that truly reaches its full numismatic value. The recent buzz around the GFRC 2.0 auction — where collectors like DM picked up stunning Liberty Seated Quarters and other rarities — has reignited a conversation I love having: when does it make sense to crack a coin out of one grading service’s slab and resubmit it to another?

In this article, I’ll walk you through everything I’ve learned about NGC-to-PCGS crossovers, how to identify genuinely undergraded coins, and the very real risks that come with breaking that plastic seal. Whether you’re eyeing a freshly won auction piece or reconsidering a coin that’s been in your collection for years, this guide will help you make an informed decision.

Why the Plastic Holder Might Be Holding Your Coin Back

Let me be blunt: not all grading services see eye to eye. I’ve examined thousands of coins that were graded by NGC and then subsequently crossed over to PCGS — and vice versa — and the discrepancies can be staggering. A coin that NGC graded MS-63 might very well be an MS-64 or even an MS-65 at PCGS, depending on the series, the date, and the specific characteristics of the piece.

This isn’t about one service being “better” than the other in some absolute sense. It’s about understanding that grading is inherently subjective, and different services have different strengths, different tolerances, and different market perceptions. PCGS, for instance, has historically commanded a premium in certain series — particularly early American coinage, Seated Liberty issues, and key-date Morgan Dollars. If your coin is sitting in an NGC holder and you know it’s undergraded relative to PCGS standards, the plastic is literally costing you money.

The GFRC auction thread is a perfect example. Collectors were showing off Liberty Seated Quarters, Trade Dollars, and Bust Halves — many of which had been photographed under less-than-ideal conditions by the original GFRC (Gerry Fortin Rare Coins). As one forum member noted, “GFRC Gen 1’s photography was among the worst I’ve ever seen. That allowed for occasional bargains and/or pleasant surprises.” When you win a coin at auction and it arrives looking better than expected, that’s often your first clue that a crack-out and resubmission might be worthwhile.

Understanding NGC-to-PCGS Crossovers: The Professional’s Perspective

When I talk about crossovers, I’m referring to the process of submitting a coin already holdered by one service to another service for a new grade. This is different from a “crack-out,” where you physically remove the coin from its holder before submitting. Let me break down both approaches.

The Crossover Submission

With a crossover, you send the coin to PCGS still in its NGC holder. PCGS will evaluate the coin through the existing plastic and assign their own grade. If the coin meets or exceeds the current grade, PCGS will encapsulate it in their own holder. If it doesn’t, they return it in the original NGC slab.

Advantages of crossover submissions:

• Lower risk: If the coin doesn’t cross, you still have the original NGC grade and holder.
• No handling damage: The coin never leaves its original encapsulation, so there’s zero risk of fingerprints, scratches, or other post-submission damage.
• Cost-effective: You’re only paying the grading fee, not the potential cost of a downgrade.

Disadvantages of crossover submissions:

• NGC holders can obscure details: The older NGC prong holders, in particular, can make it difficult for graders to fully assess luster, surface quality, and strike.
• Conservative grading through plastic: PCGS graders may be slightly more conservative when grading through another service’s holder, as they can’t handle the coin directly.

The Crack-Out Submission

This is where things get serious — and where I’ve built my reputation. A crack-out involves physically removing the coin from its NGC holder and submitting it raw to PCGS. This gives the graders full, unobstructed access to the coin, which can work in your favor if the piece is truly undergraded.

Advantages of crack-out submissions:

• Full access for graders: PCGS graders can examine every aspect of the coin — luster, strike, surface preservation, eye appeal — without any obstruction.
• Higher upgrade potential: In my experience grading crack-outs, coins that were borderline in their original holder often receive a one-point bump when evaluated raw.
• Market premium: A PCGS holder often commands a 10–30% premium over the same coin in an NGC holder, depending on the series and grade.

Disadvantages of crack-out submissions:

• Risk of downgrade: If PCGS grades the coin lower, you’ve lost value. There’s no going back — the NGC holder is destroyed.
• Handling risk: Every time a coin is handled, there’s a risk of damage. I use specialized tools and techniques to minimize this, but it’s never zero.
• Time and cost: You’re paying for grading fees, shipping, insurance, and potentially a regrade if the first attempt doesn’t go your way.

How to Identify an Undergraded Coin: The Telltale Signs

Not every coin deserves a crack-out. In fact, most don’t. The key is developing an eye for coins that are genuinely undergraded — pieces that have the characteristics of a higher grade but were perhaps submitted during a conservative grading period, or to a service with tighter standards for that particular series.

Here’s what I look for when evaluating a potential crossover candidate:

1. Luster: This is the single most important factor. A coin with full, unbroken cartwheel luster is almost never undergraded. If the luster is there but the grade seems low, something else is dragging it down — and that something might be subjective.
2. Strike quality: A sharply struck coin with full detail in the high points — Liberty’s hair on Seated quarters, the eagle’s feathers on Trade Dollars — often deserves a higher grade than a weakly struck counterpart at the same technical level.
3. Surface preservation: Fewer marks, cleaner fields, and original surfaces are the hallmarks of a higher-grade coin. If your NGC-graded coin has surfaces that look like they belong in a higher-grade holder, it’s a candidate.
4. Eye appeal: This is the intangible factor that separates good coins from great ones. Original toning, attractive patina, and overall visual impact can push a coin over the edge from one grade to the next.
5. Population data: Check the PCGS and NGC population reports. If a coin is common at the grade it’s currently in but rare at the next grade up, an upgrade can significantly increase its collectibility and value.

One forum member shared a story about a Trade Dollar purchased from GFRC that had dark, unappealing photos but turned out to have “maybe the most original surfaces I’ve ever seen on a circulated T$.” That coin subsequently CACed — a strong indicator that it was undergraded relative to its true quality. CAC (Certified Acceptance Corporation) stickers are another valuable signal: if a coin has a CAC sticker in an NGC holder, it’s already been verified as a solid or high-end example for its grade, which increases the likelihood of a successful crossover.

The Risks of Cracking Out: What Can Go Wrong

I’m not going to sugarcoat this. Cracking out a coin is a gamble, and I’ve seen it go wrong more times than I care to admit. Here are the most common pitfalls:

The Downgrade

This is the nightmare scenario. You crack out an NGC MS-64, send it to PCGS, and get back an MS-63. Now you’ve got a coin in a PCGS holder at a lower grade than it had before, and you’ve destroyed the original NGC slab. The market value has dropped, and you’ve spent money on grading fees and shipping.

How to mitigate this risk: Before cracking out, get a second opinion. Show the coin to a trusted dealer, a fellow collector, or even submit it to CAC first. If CAC stickers it, that’s a strong signal that the coin is solid for its grade and has upgrade potential.

Handling Damage

Even with the most careful technique, removing a coin from a holder carries risk. I’ve seen coins get hairline scratches from the cracking process, and I’ve seen fingerprints left on freshly exposed surfaces. These seemingly minor issues can cost you a full grade or more.

How to mitigate this risk: If you’re not experienced with crack-outs, don’t do it yourself. Use a professional service or a dealer who specializes in this work. The cost is minimal compared to the potential loss from a damaged coin.

The “No Change” Result

Sometimes you crack out a coin, submit it to PCGS, and get back the exact same grade. You’ve spent time and money for nothing, and you’re left with a coin in a different holder at the same grade. This is more common than people think, and it’s the reason I always recommend a realistic assessment before proceeding.

When to Crack Out and When to Hold: A Decision Framework

After years of doing this, I’ve developed a simple framework for deciding whether a coin is worth cracking out. Ask yourself these questions:

• Is the coin in a series where PCGS commands a significant premium? Seated Liberty, early gold, key-date Morgans — yes. Modern commemoratives — probably not.
• Is the coin likely undergraded based on luster, strike, and surfaces? If you can’t articulate specific reasons why the coin deserves a higher grade, don’t crack it out.
• What’s the financial upside of an upgrade versus the downside of a downgrade? If an upgrade would add $500 in value but a downgrade would cost $300, the math might work. But if the spread is narrow, it’s not worth the risk.
• Does the coin have CAC verification? A CAC sticker significantly increases the odds of a successful crossover.
• Can you afford to lose? If cracking out this coin and getting a downgrade would be financially devastating, don’t do it. This is a game for coins you can afford to gamble on.

The GFRC Factor: Auction Wins and Hidden Potential

The GFRC 2.0 auction thread highlights an important point: coins from well-regarded dealers who are known for conservative photography or conservative grading can be prime candidates for crossovers. Gerry Fortin built a reputation for offering high-quality coins, but as multiple forum members noted, his photography was often unflattering — sometimes dramatically so.

One collector shared a side-by-side comparison of an 1872-S Seated Half Dollar: the PCGS TrueView showed a stunning proof-like gem, while Gerry’s photo made it look flat and lifeless. “Someone got that coin for a bargain,” the collector noted. This is exactly the kind of situation where a crack-out makes sense — when the market has undervalued a coin because of poor presentation rather than poor quality.

With GFRC 2.0 under new ownership (Matt and Darrell), the photography has improved significantly. As one member put it, “Darrell’s images are high resolution and they look very much like the coin in hand.” But even with better photos, the fundamental principle remains: if you win a coin at auction and it exceeds expectations when it arrives, consider whether the holder it’s in is doing it justice.

My Personal Crack-Out Rules

After two decades in this business, here are the rules I live by:

1. Never crack out a coin with a CAC sticker unless you’re absolutely certain it will upgrade. The CAC sticker already adds value, and cracking it out removes that premium.
2. Always submit to crossover first before attempting a crack-out. If the coin crosses at the same grade, you’ve saved yourself the risk of a crack-out. If it doesn’t cross, you have more information to work with.
3. Know the series. Some series are more likely to cross than others. Seated Liberty quarters, for example, have historically crossed well from NGC to PCGS, while certain modern issues may not.
4. Document everything. Photograph the coin extensively before cracking it out. If something goes wrong during the process, you’ll want a record of the coin’s original condition.
5. Be patient. Grading services can take weeks or even months. Don’t rush the process, and don’t submit to multiple services simultaneously — it’s a waste of money and can raise red flags.

Conclusion: The Art of Knowing When to Break the Slab

The crack-out game is not for everyone, and it’s certainly not for every coin. But for those willing to do the homework, develop a trained eye, and accept the inherent risks, it can be one of the most rewarding aspects of serious numismatics. The difference between an NGC MS-64 and a PCGS MS-65 on a key-date Seated Quarter can be thousands of dollars — and that difference often comes down to nothing more than a different set of eyes looking at the same coin.

The GFRC auction thread is a reminder that great coins are still out there, sometimes hiding behind bad photos, conservative grades, or unfamiliar holders. DM’s Liberty Seated Quarter, the Trade Dollars with original surfaces, the Bust Halves that made collectors gasp — these are the kinds of coins that deserve a second look. And sometimes, that second look means breaking the slab.

As I always tell my clients: the coin doesn’t care what plastic it’s in. But the market does. Know the difference, and you’ll never leave money on the table.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Trading the Gold-to-Silver Ratio Using Mint Sewn Bags vs. Mint Sealed Rolls: A Precious Metal Trader’s Deep Dive into Condition, Premiums, and Strategic Swapping – Smart stackers don’t just hold; they trade the ratios. Here’s how this item fits into a broader precious met…
• Will a CAC Sticker Double the Value of Your Peace Dollar? Decoding the Premium for High-Grade 1921 Issues – The CAC Premium: Why a “Bean” Matters More Than You Think In today’s market, a green or gold bean can …
• Building a Winning PCGS/NGC Registry Set: Lessons from the GFRC Auction and the Art of the Upgrade – For top-tier collectors, the Registry Set competition doesn’t just influence the market — it drives it. Let me sho…