Using Thermal Dynamics and Material Science to Reduce Your Company’s AWS/Azure/GCP Bill

Every developer’s workflow affects your cloud bill more than you think. I’ve spent years tracking this exact connection – how small coding and architecture choices quietly drive up AWS, Azure, or GCP costs. The good news? We can fix this with some clever physics principles.

The Hidden Cost of Inefficient Cloud Resource Utilization

When I first started as a FinOps specialist, I expected to find big, obvious waste. Instead, I found thousands of tiny inefficiencies piling up like those old plastic coin tubes that squeeze tighter over time, trapping copper pennies inside.

Your cloud costs work the same way. A container sized 20% too big here, a database with unused capacity there, functions running longer than needed, and forgotten resources left on 24/7. These add up fast.

So what if we treated our cloud infrastructure like those stuck coins? What if we used thermal dynamics, material science, and smart mechanics to make our AWS, Azure, or GCP bills more efficient?

The Physics Behind the Problem

Those coin tube problems weren’t about strength. They were about understanding how materials behave. Plastic contracts over time while copper stays put, creating a perfect trap.

Your cloud has similar “stuck coins” – over-provisioned resources that get locked in place. The plastic? Your old architecture decisions. The friction? Technical debt that makes change hard. The coins? Underutilized compute and storage you’re paying for but not using.

Applying Thermal Dynamics to Cloud Optimization

The smartest coin tube fix used controlled thermal expansion. Heat made the plastic expand more than the copper, creating just enough space to free the coins. We can do the same with our cloud costs through smart resource elasticity management.

Phase 1: Environmental Assessment (The “Freezer Test”)

Before making changes, assess your current setup like testing if cold helps with coin tubes. Start with visibility:

• Implement Cost Allocation Tags for all resources (env=prod, team=api, service=user-auth)
• Set up daily cost anomaly detection with AWS Cost Anomaly Detection, Azure Cost Management, or GCP Cost Table
• Use AWS Compute Optimizer, Azure Advisor, or GCP Recommender for baseline analysis

Here’s a quick script to tag your existing AWS EC2 instances:


# Tag existing EC2 instances by naming pattern
aws ec2 describe-instances --query 'Reservations[].Instances[?starts_with(Tags[?Key==`Name`].Value, `prod-`)]' | \
jq -r '.[] | "aws ec2 create-tags --resources " + .InstanceId + " --tags Key=Environment,Value=Production Key=Owner,Value=finance-team"' | bash


Phase 2: Targeted Heat Application (The “Boiling Water” Method)

Now apply targeted “heat” – interventions that give your resources room to breathe without breaking things:

• Auto-scaling groups with dynamic CPU/memory thresholds (not just time-based)
• Serverless optimization: Right-size Lambda/Cloud Functions memory and timeout settings
• Database tiering: Move infrequently accessed data to cheaper storage tiers

For Lambda functions, test different memory settings. Higher memory often means faster execution and lower total cost, even with a higher per-minute rate. Here’s a simple Python test:


import boto3, json, time

configs = [{'Memory': 128}, {'Memory': 256}, {'Memory': 512}, {'Memory': 1024}]
results = []

for config in configs:
start = time.time()
# Update function configuration
lambda_client.update_function_configuration(
FunctionName='cost-test-function',
MemorySize=config['Memory']
)

# Run 50 invocations and capture metrics
for i in range(50):
response = lambda_client.invoke(FunctionName='cost-test-function')

# Calculate cost per 10k invocations
duration = time.time() - start
cost = (config['Memory']/1024) * duration * 0.00001667 * 10000
results.append({**config, 'duration': duration, 'cost_per_10k': cost})


Mechanical Advantage Through Architecture

The best coin tube solutions used tools to amplify human effort. In cloud architecture, we do the same:

Container Optimization (The Pipe Cutter Approach)

Like a pipe cutter that slices cleanly without damage, container optimization needs precision:

• Implement multi-stage Docker builds to reduce image size
• Use Kubernetes vertical pod autoscalers for microservice optimization
• Adopt distroless images for production workloads

Here’s a Dockerfile that cuts the fat:


# Build stage
FROM python:3.11-slim as builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --user -r requirements.txt

# Runtime stage
FROM python:3.11-slim
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /root/.local /root/.local
COPY . .
ENV PATH=/root/.local/bin:$PATH
CMD ["python", "main.py"]


Data Pipeline Efficiency (The Acetone Dissolution Method)

Acetone dissolves plastic but leaves coins intact. We need the same for data pipelines – removing inefficiency without breaking functionality:

• Implement data partitioning in BigQuery/Redshift/Snowflake
• Use columnar file formats (Parquet, ORC) for storage and processing
• Adopt serverless data processing with Spark on AWS EMR Serverless or GCP Dataproc Serverless

Long-Term Shrinkage Prevention

Even after freeing your “coins,” the tubes can shrink again. Cloud costs creep up without ongoing management. Here’s how to stop it:

FinOps Automation Framework

Set up a 3-tier system:

1. Prevention: Automated tag enforcement via infrastructure as code (IaC)
2. Detection: Real-time cost alerts with Slack/Teams notifications
3. Correction: Automated shutdown of non-compliant resources

Example Terraform for AWS cost controls:


resource "aws_s3_bucket" "log_bucket" {
bucket = "cost-optimization-logs"
}

resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_group" "cost_alerts" {
name = "/finops/cost-alerts"
}

# SNS topic for cost alerts
resource "aws_sns_topic" "cost_alerts" {
name = "cost-optimization-alerts"
}

# Lambda function to shut down untagged resources
resource "aws_lambda_function" "auto_remediate" {
filename = "remediate.zip"
function_name = "auto-remediate-untagged"
role = aws_iam_role.lambda.arn
handler = "index.handler"
runtime = "python3.9"
}


Cross-Cloud Benchmarking

Different materials respond differently to heat. Same with cloud providers. Regular testing across platforms keeps costs optimal:

• Benchmark identical workloads across AWS, Azure, GCP using Terraform modules
• Implement cloud-agnostic services where possible (PostgreSQL, Redis)
• Use multi-cloud Kubernetes for workload portability

When to Apply Force vs. When to Walk Away

The most important lesson from the coin tube discussion? “If the coins aren’t worth your time, let them go.”

Apply this to cloud costs:

• Resources costing < $100/month: Automated detection only
• Resources $100-1000/month: Manual review quarterly
• Resources > $1000/month: Dedicated optimization sprint

For serverless, track cost-per-business-transaction, not just raw cost. A $50 Lambda function processing $500k in revenue? Worth every penny.

Conclusion: The Physics of Cloud Efficiency

Whether it’s 1960s coin tubes or modern cloud infrastructure, the best solutions combine:

1. Material Science → Understanding your resources (compute, storage, network)
2. Thermal Dynamics → Applying the right “temperature” at the right time (scaling, auto-optimization)
3. Mechanical Advantage → Using tools to amplify your efforts (automation, architecture patterns)
4. Economic Calculus → Focusing effort where it matters most

Next time you see a “stuck” resource in your cloud environment, don’t reach for the sledgehammer. Think like a physicist.

The best cloud optimization isn’t about brute force. It’s about understanding how materials behave, when to apply heat, and when to use tools to multiply your impact. Your cloud bill is a physics problem. Solve it like one.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Engineering Manager’s Guide: Onboarding Teams to Handle Stuck Penny Tubes with Precision – Want your team to master a tricky task fast? It starts with smart onboarding. I’ve built training programs that get team…
• Enterprise Integration at Scale: How to Unlock Legacy Data Stored in ‘Shrink-Wrapped’ Systems (Like Vintage Coin Tubes) – Rolling out new tools in a large enterprise? It’s not just about the tech. Real success comes down to three things: inte…
• How Thermal Expansion Principles from Vintage Coin Tubes Can Inspire More Resilient Software Systems (And Lower Your Tech Insurance Costs) – Tech companies face constant pressure to keep systems stable, secure, and scalable. The kicker? Better risk management o…