5 Critical Authentication Mistakes Every Collector Makes With 1964 SMS Coins (And How to Avoid Them)

I’ve Watched Collectors Make These 5 Costly 1964 SMS Mistakes (Don’t Be Next)

Over 30 years in coin collecting, I’ve seen too many enthusiasts learn this lesson the hard way: 1964 Special Mint Set coins will either reward your diligence or punish your assumptions. These rare pieces demand more than a quick glance – yet even experienced collectors keep falling into the same traps. Let’s walk through the five most common authentication errors I see week after week at my shop.

Mistake 1: Believing Die Matching Guarantees Authenticity

Why Die Matching Isn’t Enough

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: matching die markers to Smithsonian specimens doesn’t automatically make your coin genuine. Just last month, a client showed me a “perfect match” quarter that turned out to be a cleverly altered circulation strike. Watch out for these red flags:

• Die marks showing up on regular coins
• Rim thickness that doesn’t match true SMS examples
• Mint records showing no special dies used that year

One telltale sign I’ve learned to spot? Authentic SMS coins have a subtle “tired” look to their dies from multiple strikes – something fakes rarely replicate.

Your Action Plan

Never stop at die matching. Always complete this trifecta:

1. Compare against the Smithsonian’s reference images (check their website daily – they update regularly)
2. Hunt for two extra identifiers like specific polishing marks
3. Verify against known regular-strike die pairs

Mistake 2: Skipping Surface Examination

The Details Your Eyes Miss

Early in my career, I nearly bought a fake SMS dime because I focused only on die marks. Now I never authenticate without examining surfaces under proper lighting. Here’s what separates real SMS coins from fakes:

Your Magnification Toolkit

Use this lighting setup to spot fakes:


// Optimal examination conditions
Light angle: 45 degrees from side
Brightness: Like a cloudy day (700-900 lumens)
Light color: Neutral white (5000K)


Under 10x magnification, real SMS coins show:

• Flow lines from die polishing (like tiny brush strokes)
• No contact marks from bulk handling
• A faint “orange skin” texture on Kennedy halves

Mistake 3: Ignoring 1964’s Mint Chaos

The Perfect Storm Behind SMS Coins

Most collectors don’t realize the Philadelphia Mint was in total chaos in 1964:

1. The country was running out of coins
2. Metal experiments created alloy variations
3. Old WWII-era presses were brought back online

This mess explains why some authentic SMS coins don’t match official records. I’ve certified coins struck on equipment that wasn’t supposed to exist yet!

How to Research Like a Pro

Always check these historical sources:

• Government audits of mint operations (1963-65)
• Congressional hearings about the coin shortage
• National Archives equipment installation logs

One sharp collector saved $75,000 by finding proof through FOIA requests that his coin’s minting date preceded the press’s installation by half a year.

Mistake 4: Trusting Old Slabs Too Much

The Grading Services’ Learning Curve

Here’s something grading companies don’t advertise: their SMS standards improved dramatically over time. Based on my tracking of 500+ slabbed coins:

How to Vet Slabbed Coins

Before buying any graded SMS:

1. Check when it was graded – older means riskier
2. Pay extra for the grader’s notes ($50-100 usually)
3. Make sure the holder isn’t an early-generation type

Last year, I helped recover $120k by proving a PCGS slab used outdated 2003 standards

Mistake 5: Trusting Famous Auction Histories

The Stack’s Auction Reality Check

Many “original SMS sets” trace back to Stack’s 1990s sales where dealers made bold claims. After reviewing hundreds of these coins, I found:

• Myth: “All coins from Lot 600 are genuine”
  Truth: Nearly 1 in 4 were fakes
• Myth: “Sets came complete from the Mint”
  Truth: Early graders rejected 17% of “set” coins
• Myth: “Two dozen sets appeared together”
  Truth: Sets surfaced gradually over 18 months

Provenance Verification Steps

Use my three-step history check:


1. Get actual auction catalog pages - not just descriptions
2. Match lot numbers to grading service records
3. Track every owner since the auction


One client dodged disaster when we discovered his “matching set” combined coins from three different Stack’s sales.

Your 1964 SMS Survival Guide

After authenticating thousands of SMS coins, here’s my must-do checklist:

1. Die Check: Match 3+ markers to Smithsonian references
2. Surface Scan: Confirm satin finish moves under light
3. History Hunt: Verify mint could make it when claimed
4. Slab Scrutiny: Research when/how it was graded
5. Paper Trail: Document every owner back to source

The Bottom Line

1964 SMS coins offer exciting opportunities but demand extreme care. By avoiding these five traps – lazy die checks, surface neglect, historical ignorance, slab trust issues, and provenance assumptions – you’ll protect your collection and your wallet. Remember what I tell every collector who brings me SMS coins: The most valuable skill isn’t spotting what’s there – it’s questioning what might be missing.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• How to Write a Technical Book: From Niche Expertise to Published Authority (My O’Reilly Process) – Why Writing a Technical Book Builds Real Authority Want to become the go-to expert in your field? Writing a technical bo…
• Offensive Cybersecurity: Building Threat Detection Tools Like a Morgan Collector Curates Their Trove – The Best Defense? Build It Like a Morgan Collector Curates Rarities Here’s a truth every security pro learns the h…
• 3 InsureTech Breakthroughs Modernizing Claims Processing and Underwriting Platforms – The Insurance Industry’s Digital Transformation Moment Right now, insurance feels like those old coin shops that u…