Crafting Potential of the 1955-S RPM-002 Lincoln Cent: A Jewelry Maker’s Deep Dive

Not Every Coin Belongs on the Finger: A Craftsman’s Dilemma

After a decade of coaxing coins into rings, I’ve developed a sixth sense for which pieces yearn for transformation. When this 1955-S RPM-002 Lincoln Cent landed in my workshop, I felt that familiar thrill – quickly tempered by collector’s conscience. Let’s explore why this particular wheat penny makes both my jeweler’s heart race and my numismatist’s palms sweat.

History Struck in Copper: The RPM-002’s Pedigree

Born in the twilight years of San Francisco’s Wheat Penny production, this 1955-S specimen carries more than its weight in history. That tiny “S” mintmark beneath the date? It’s not just a letter – it’s a fingerprint of mid-century minting. This repunched mintmark variety showcases the very human process behind our coinage, created when a mint worker’s hammer struck the die twice, slightly askew.

Through my loupe, the RPM-002 reveals its secrets like a well-loved book:

• The primary mintmark sits properly centered
• A ghostly second impression angles northwest
• Die chips near LIBERTY resemble constellations
• Faint stress lines radiate like sunbeams from Lincoln’s brow

While not a rare variety in the strictest sense, its AU (About Uncirculated) examples possess that magical combination of sharp strike and warm original luster that makes collectors’ hearts skip. The 95% copper composition gives it that rich, rosy glow we wheat cent enthusiasts cherish – but as we’ll see, that same softness becomes its Achilles’ heel in jewelry.

The Copper Conundrum: Beauty vs. Longevity

Metal Matters

Unlike silver coins that gain character with wear, this cent’s makeup presents unique challenges:

• 95% Copper: Malleable enough to dome beautifully but softer than your fingernail
• 5% Zinc: Creates that distinctive golden-pink hue but invites oxidation
• 0% Noble Metals: Won’t develop that desirable sterling patina, just verdigris

Reality Check

Here’s what 70 years of metallurgy teaches us:

• Raw copper rings lose definition faster than yesterday’s newspaper
• Skin acids accelerate corrosion, especially where zinc content surfaces
• Protective coatings dull the very eye appeal we aim to preserve

Even in mint condition, this coin would surrender its crisp details to daily wear within months. The heartbreaking truth? That gorgeous original patina we numismatists admire becomes a maintenance nightmare when worn.

Design Dynamics: When History Meets the Hammer

The Artisan’s Puzzle

Transforming this RPM into jewelry means making brutal design choices:

• Lincoln’s noble profile often flattens into abstraction
• The prized repunched mintmark typically disappears into the band’s curve
• Die cracks might create fascinating texture… or just look like damage

“A coin’s soul lives in its high points. When you dome a wheat penny, you’re bargaining with history – which details will you sacrifice to the ring gods?”

– Elena Marquez, Third-Generation Coin Silversmith

Size Matters Desperately

At 19mm, we’re working with a canvas smaller than your pinky nail:

• Size 6 rings might spare the mintmark (if the planets align)
• Beyond size 7, Lincoln’s ear vanishes like yesterday’s coffee
• The date survives best when centered – a millimeter off ruins everything

The Collector’s Wince: Ethics of Alteration

Holding multiple AU specimens? Let’s address the 800-pound gorilla in the workshop:

• Numismatic Value: $15-$75 for certified AU examples
• Crafted Value: $45-$120 as jewelry (but destroys the coin’s provenance)
• Historical Cost: Each altered RPM disappears from the collecting ecosystem forever

“Our guild’s first rule: Never sacrifice a coin that tells a story. Seek impaired specimens – cleaned, bent, or holed – for your art.”

– Coin Jewelers Guild Code of Ethics

The Verdict: A Love Letter to Collectors

After days of contemplation, here’s my impassioned plea:

If You Must Create…

• Choose your smallest specimen (size 6 max)
• Document every diagnostic detail before striking
• Use renaissance wax instead of epoxy to allow future conservation
• Consider a display pendant instead of a ring

Why My Heart Says “No”

• The RPM-002’s value lies in its minting story, not its metal
• Each AU example preserved is a time capsule for future generations
• Common 1955-S cents make identical rings without numismatic guilt

Conclusion: Let This One Live

Some coins beg to be worn – silver Morgans with slick fields, worn Seated Liberties with stories etched in their scars. But this RPM-002? It’s a museum piece in copper clothing. Those die cracks map the stress of a working die. That doubled mintmark captures a mint worker’s off-day. The gentle patina whispers of 70 years’ careful preservation.

To my fellow artisans: We’re storytellers first. Sometimes the most powerful act of preservation is knowing when to put down the hammer. Let this RPM rest in a collector’s album, where future generations can marvel at its unfiltered history. After all, the most precious things we craft aren’t always the things we make – sometimes they’re the pieces we choose not to alter.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Preserving History: Expert Conservation Guide for the 1955-S RPM-002 Lincoln Cent – The Fragile Legacy of Lincoln Cents: Every Collector’s Sacred Duty Hold that 1955-S RPM-002 Lincoln Cent in your p…
• Unlocking the Value of Your 1955-S RPM-002: A Professional Grader’s Guide to Spotting $10 vs. $1,000 Coins – Condition Is King: Grading the Legendary 1955-S RPM-002 After three decades grading coins at PCGS and NGC, I’ll le…
• 1955 S RPM-002 Authentication Bible: Critical Diagnostics for Collectors – The Counterfeit Crisis in Rare Penny Varieties As counterfeiters grow more sophisticated, mastering the 1955 S RPM-002 L…