Beyond Official Minting: Tokens and Unofficial Currency Surrounding the Legendary 1868 $5 Liberty Head Nickel

Sometimes, the unofficial money tells a richer story than the official issues. Let’s explore the tokens and medals that surround this fascinating topic.

If you’ve been tracking the latest buzz in the numismatic community, you’ve likely seen the excitement surrounding a remarkable 1868 $5 Liberty Head nickel recently submitted to the Certified Acceptance Corporation (CAC). I’ve seen this coin—it stands out for its exceptional mint condition, bright luster, and eye appeal, not to mention that subtle copper corrosion known as “schmutz.” But wait, there’s more! This specimen was graded prior to Fairmont Auctions’ entry into the market back in June 2018, meaning it lacks the signature “Fairmont look” that characterized later submissions. With a retail value around $43,000 and a potential CAC value reaching $60,000, it proves just how rare and elusive early American numismatics can be. Yet, as an exonumia enthusiast, I look past this official mint issue. I’m drawn to the broader, fascinating world of unofficial currency—tokens and medals—that provides a deeper historical narrative and a parallel set of challenges for the collector.

Understanding Scarcity and Authentication: The Numismatic Benchmark

Before diving into the world of tokens, we must understand the rigorous standards applied to even the most prestigious numismatic coins. In my experience grading, authenticating a high-value specimen like the 1868 $5 Liberty Head nickel requires far more than a quick glance. It demands a deep understanding of die states, minting anomalies, and the subtle nuances of surface preservation. As the forum discussion highlighted, many “MS” coins from this era are actually sliders rather than true Mint State specimens. Genuine MS63 pieces are incredibly scarce—fewer than 100 are known across all services, making it a POP 1/0 from every grading service. When collectors encounter a coin with mint luster and no flatness on all surfaces, the bar is set very high. However, when we shift our focus to unofficial currency, the principles of scarcity, grading, and authentication remain just as critical, though the criteria differ significantly.

The Cost of Opinion: Navigating the Authentication Market

One of the most heated topics in the forum thread was the cost of getting a coin officially recognized by the CAC. At $400 for an initial opinion—or $150 with a 15% discount if the coin fails to sticker—the financial barrier can feel daunting. Collectors often wonder if the investment is worth it, especially when dealing with high-dollar coins that might get “beaned” by the grader. While some argue the CAC process helps cross the coin into PCGS or NGC slabs, making it easier for future buyers to find, others believe the POP nature of the coin means the buyer simply looks at it and pays the asking price anyway. Regardless of one’s stance on the CAC’s value proposition, the authentication process underscores a universal truth in numismatics: verifying the authenticity and grade of a coin is the gateway to realizing its full numismatic value.

Hard Times Tokens: When Official Money Failed

To truly appreciate the value of unofficial currency, we must travel back to the 1830s—an era marked by severe economic depression known as the “Hard Times.” During this period, the official monetary system faltered, and citizens desperately needed a medium of exchange. Enter the Hard Times tokens: small, privately minted copper or bronze pieces that served as the de facto currency of the era.

In my collection, I have always been drawn to Hard Times tokens because they represent the resilience of the common man when the banking system failed.

These tokens were lifelines. They featured diverse designs, ranging from simple denominations to highly detailed allegorical representations of liberty and industry. The 1833–1835 New York State Bank Tokens and the 1835 half cent are prime examples of how engravers used their skills to create functional, albeit unofficial, money. Today, collectors prize these tokens for their rare variety and intricate hubbing techniques. Unlike the polished, official look of the 1868 $5 nickel, Hard Times tokens often bear the visible imperfections of hand-struck or hub-based striking, adding to their historical authenticity.

• Design Variety: Hard Times tokens feature a wide array of motifs, from classic allegories of liberty to local landmark scenes.
• Economic Relevance: They were essential during the Panic of 1837, providing liquidity when banks failed.
• Collectibility: Due to their historical context and unique striking qualities, they command strong premiums among specialized collectors.

Civil War Tokens: The Foundation of Modern Exonumia

If Hard Times tokens represent the nadir of the official monetary system, Civil War tokens represent the zenith of unofficial currency. Issued between 1861 and 1864, these tokens were struck in vast quantities to help fund the war effort and provide small change to merchants facing a shortage of United States coinage. This era is widely considered the genesis of modern exonumia, as the sheer volume and variety laid the groundwork for the hobby as we know it today.

The Civil War tokens are the backbone of the exonumia hobby. Without them, there would be no collectors, no markets, and no authentication standards.

These tokens are categorized into four main types: Type A (Government Aid), Type B (Private Soldier Pay), Type C (Private Merchant Pay), and Type D (Local/Private Merchant Pay). Each type tells a different story of the conflict. Type A tokens were authorized by the U.S. government to help soldiers, while Types B and C were privately issued by individuals and businesses. The variety is staggering, with hundreds of different dies and reverses cataloged by collectors. When evaluating a Civil War token, one must consider the metal composition (usually bronze or copper-plated steel), the weight, and the strike quality. Just as the 1868 $5 nickel requires a keen eye for mint luster and lack of flatness, authenticating a Civil War token requires an understanding of die cracking, hub doubling, and planchet variations.

Key Grading Criteria for Civil War Tokens

1. Striking Quality: Are the devices sharp and well-defined, or are they soft and blob-like?
2. Metal Composition: Bronze (copper) or steel (often plated)? Steel tends to oxidize more aggressively.
3. Surface Preservation: Look for natural patina versus artificial toning. Authentic tokens should show consistent wear patterns typical of circulation.
4. Die State: Are there signs of die cracking or gouging? This indicates genuine use and age.

Merchant Tokens: Advertising and Community Identity

Long before the Civil War, merchant tokens were already serving a vital commercial purpose. In the 19th century, small businesses frequently lacked the capital to mint large quantities of coinage, especially in rural areas where official currency was scarce. These tokens—often referred to as “trade dollars” or “local currency”—provided a practical solution. They typically featured the merchant’s name, location, and sometimes an advertisement or a local landmark. They weren’t just trade tools; they were statements of community identity.

Consider a merchant token from a bustling 19th-century city like New Orleans or Baltimore. The reverse might feature a local cathedral or a prominent warehouse, while the obverse bears the merchant’s name and a portrait of liberty. For collectors, these tokens offer a window into local history that official coinages simply cannot provide. The challenge in collecting merchant tokens lies in identifying the issuing merchant, as many names are obscure without deep research. Once identified, the premiums can be substantial, particularly for those with verifiable histories.

Actionable Takeaways for Merchant Token Collectors

• Research the Merchant: Look up historical directories or local business registries to confirm the issuing entity.
• Check for VAMs: Verify die states, as early strikes often feature sharper devices.
• Beware of Repros: Many reproductions exist. Always compare metallurgical composition and weight.

Historical Counterfeits and Forgeries: The Shadow Market

No discussion of unofficial currency would be complete without addressing the dark side: historical counterfeits and forgeries. Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, enterprising individuals attempted to pass off counterfeit tokens as genuine. These counterfeits were often produced using hand-carved hubs and simple press methods, resulting in coins that looked convincing but lacked the subtle die flaws of authentic pieces.

In my years of examining tokens, I have seen firsthand how sophisticated forgeries can fool even experienced collectors. It is a constant battle between the forger’s ambition and the collector’s knowledge.

The most common method involved taking genuine dies and creating “hubbed” copies, which bore a high degree of similarity but still exhibited telltale signs of artificial aging or incorrect weight. Today, authentication services like PCGS and NGC employ advanced imaging technology to detect these anomalies. Just as the 1868 $5 nickel required authentication to separate the genuine MS63 from sliders or altered Fairmont copies, exonumia requires rigorous scrutiny. The presence of “schmutz”—as seen on the reverse of the 1868 $5 in the forum thread—can sometimes be artificially induced, making chemical analysis and metallurgical testing indispensable.

Identifying Counterfeit Tokens: Red Flags

• Weight Discrepancies: Counterfeits often fail strict weight tolerances established by the U.S. Assay Office.
• Die Doubling: Artificial hubbing usually results in obvious, unnatural doubling rather than the subtle doubling of genuine hubbing.
• Patina: Genuine circulation wear produces a natural, mixed patina, whereas artificial toning often looks too uniform or overly dark.
• Provenance: Never purchase a token without documented ownership history or grading certification.

Bridging the Gap: The 1868 $5 as a Microcosm of Numismatic History

Returning to the forum thread, the discussion surrounding the 1868 $5 Liberty Head nickel perfectly encapsulates the themes of scarcity, authentication, and historical significance that define the world of unofficial currency. The fact that the coin was graded before Fairmont’s entry into the market meant that collectors had to rely on PCGS’s original grading rather than the inflated values that came later. Similarly, when collectors evaluate Hard Times, Civil War, or merchant tokens, they must rely on their own expertise and established grading criteria to determine authenticity and grade.

The debate over whether the $400 CAC fee is worth it mirrors the debate over whether investing in authentication services truly maximizes a coin’s value. Some collectors prefer to hold onto their coins, knowing the ultimate buyer will inspect the piece firsthand. Others see the slab as a necessary marketing tool to reach a wider audience. Regardless, the underlying principle remains the same: the collector’s eye must be sharp, the historical context must be understood, and the provenance must be unimpeachable.

Conclusion: The Enduring Value of Unofficial Money

As we conclude this exploration of tokens and medals, it becomes clear that the unofficial money of America is far more than just a curiosity. Hard Times tokens remind us of the fragility of the economy; Civil War tokens stand as monuments to necessity and innovation; merchant tokens preserve the stories of local enterprises; and the ongoing battle against counterfeits protects the integrity of the hobby. Much like the legendary 1868 $5 Liberty Head nickel, which demands a discerning eye and a willingness to navigate the complexities of grading and authentication, the

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Comparing the Allure of the 1868 $5 Liberty to Ancient Numismatics: A Specialist’s Perspective – How does collecting this relatively modern piece compare to holding a coin struck in the Roman Empire? Let’s compa…
• Can You Still Find NEWP 1868 5 at Flea Markets and Pawn Shops? – The days of easy finds are mostly gone, but there is still treasure out there if you know exactly what you are looking f…
• Auction House Secrets: How to Maximize Profits Selling an MS-63 1868 Liberty Head $5 at Auction – There is a massive difference between selling on eBay and consigning to a major auction house. The gap between a casual …