Chemical Interventions in Numismatics: The Surprising History of E-Z-Est and MS-70 Coin Cleaners
December 28, 2025Chemical Cleaning Exposed: How to Authenticate Coins After E-Z-Est or MS-70 Treatment
December 28, 2025The Devil’s in the Details: Why Error Hunting Makes Hearts Race
What separates pocket change from a five-figure treasure? Often, it’s a hairline fracture or microscopic doubling that casual eyes miss. After thirty years of scrutinizing coins under loupes, I’ve learned this truth: numismatic value whispers rather than shouts. While newcomers obsess over cleaning methods like E-Z-est or MS-70, veteran collectors understand that authentic collectibility lives in those glorious minting mistakes—die cracks stretching like lightning across fields, misplaced mint marks, and doubled dies that turn common dates into legendary rarities.
Chemistry’s Double-Edged Sword: To Clean or Not to Clean?
Before we hunt errors, let’s confront every collector’s dilemma. The original forum thread asked about chemical cleaners like E-Z-est (sulfuric acid and thiourea) and MS-70 (sodium hydroxide solution). One member’s confession still haunts me: “I turned $10k in gold coins into $2k scrap with MS-70.” Why? Because stripping a coin’s original patina doesn’t just anger grading services—it annihilates historical evidence. That natural skin holds secrets: oxidation patterns confirming authenticity, subtle topography revealing die states. Destroy it, and you’ve murdered provenance.
The Error Hunter’s Cleaning Trilemma
- E-Z-est: Acid eats surfaces. Might expose die cracks but often leaves ghosting that kills eye appeal.
- MS-70**: Alkaline brute force. Removes stubborn gunk but leaves unnatural luster—a death sentence for subtle doubled dies.
- Acetone Baths: The collector’s sacred ritual. Dissolves PVC goo without touching original surfaces. Always test on 1965 quarters first!
“A cleaned coin is a haunted coin”—wisdom from CONECA forums. Once you strip it, the story’s gone forever.
Error Autopsy: Three Golden Fingerprints
1. Die Cracks & Cuds: The Mint’s Cry for Help
Seek raised lines linking design elements like numismatic spiderwebs. A cud—that charming blob on the rim—forms when die chunks snap off mid-strike. Diagnostic tells:
- Location Matters: 90% appear near vulnerable text like “E Pluribus Unum”
- Texture Tale: Matte finish from fractured, unpolished dies
- Progression Clues: Faint cracks signal late die stages—prime for rare varieties
2. Doubled Dies: The Collector’s Obsession
Forget machine doubling’s flat smears. True doubled dies (Classes I-V) scream “jackpot” with split serifs and sculpted overlapping elements. Hunt these legends:
- 1955 DDO Lincoln Cent: $1,500+ even in Good grade—if original surfaces remain
- 1939 DDR Jefferson Nickel: Doubled columns on Monticello
- 1942/1 Mercury Dime: Overmint where the “2” swallows the “1” (check thickness!)
3. Mint Mark Ghosts: Small Details, Big Paydays
Repunched mintmarks (RPMs) cast faint shadows under 10x magnification. Holy grails include:
- 1909-S VDB Cent: The “S” mintmark’s placement relative to wheat stalks
- 1916-D Mercury Dime: Weak “D” strikes looking like phantom bumps
- 1972-P Quarter RPM: Floating roof variety ($200+ in AU with original toning)
From Junk Bin to Jewel Box: Error Coin Resurrection Stories
The 1955 “Bugs Bunny” Franklin Half
A dramatic die clash gave Ben Franklin buck teeth—but only Philadelphia strikes show this $500+ quirk. Cleaning risk? Acid dips erode clash marks near the jaw, turning a rarity into a details-free zombie.
The 1943 Copper Cent: A War-Time Mistake
Though not an error, these bronze-struck WWII cents teach brutal lessons. As one collector lamented: “Nic-A-Date etchings butchered my ‘43’s alloy authenticity.” Any surface alteration murders both eye appeal and provenance for such rarities.
Building Your Error-Hunting Arsenal
- Optics: 10x loupe with adjustable LED—shadow angles reveal hidden doubling
- Bibles: Cherrypickers’ Guide and CONECA online archives
- Gentle Care: Distilled water soaks for crusty coins; NEVER scrub die cracks
Guardian of History: Your Preservation Oath
As the old-timers warn: “A coin’s skin is its soul.” For errors, that natural patina protects diagnostic landscapes. Store finds in archival Mylar—PVC invites green death. Remember: humidity corrodes cleaned coins fastest where die cracks breach surfaces. Would you strip the varnish off a Rembrandt?
Conclusion: Become a Numismatic Detective
Error coins are buried treasure with historical fingerprints. That 1969-S Lincoln Cent with doubled die obverse? It’s a $50k+ time capsule disguised as spare change—if you spot the split serifs in “LIBERTY.” True value lies not in artificial luster, but in the mint’s authentic stumbles. Heed our forum elders: “Train your eyes on wheat pennies before touching silver.” Your next roll hunt could rewrite numismatic history—provided you preserve the evidence for future generations.
Related Resources
You might also find these related articles helpful:
- Chemical Interventions in Numismatics: The Surprising History of E-Z-Est and MS-70 Coin Cleaners – The Hidden Chemistry in Your Coin Cabinet Every relic in your collection whispers secrets through its patina and luster …
- Chemical Cleaners & Numismatic Value: How E-Z-est, MS-70, and Nic-A-Date Impact Your Collection’s Worth – Ever held a coin that’s lost its magic after a chemical bath? As a numismatist with decades of hands-on experience…
- The Hawaiian Commemorative Half Dollar: A Bullion Investor’s Guide to When Numismatic Value Dwarfs Silver Content – Ever held a coin where the story outweighs the silver? Let’s crack open the vault on melt value versus numismatic …