How Source Code Analysis Expertise Can Build Your Career as a Tech Expert Witness
December 1, 2025How Coin Grading Variability Mirrors Tech Debt: A CTO’s Strategic Playbook for Standardization
December 1, 2025In high-frequency trading, milliseconds matter and edges hide in plain sight
As a quant researcher studying market patterns, I’ve learned to look beyond traditional data feeds. One afternoon, while sorting through my grandfather’s coin collection, I noticed something intriguing about silver war nickels. These 1942-1945 coins – minted with 35% silver during wartime shortages – turned out to be more than historical artifacts. Their survival rates mirror exactly how liquidity vanishes in electronic markets.
When coins teach us about market gaps
Silver war nickels disappeared from circulation through three distinct phases:
- Everyday wear (1942-1963): 35-45% vanished
- Silver melts (1964-1980): Another 50-70% destroyed
- Collector attrition (1980-present): 25-40% slowly lost
This isn’t just numismatic history. It’s a perfect case study in how assets become scarce – much like how certain stocks become hard to trade during volatile periods. The same factors that made dealers avoid war nickels (difficult silver extraction, uneven quality) create similar blind spots in algo trading today.
Modeling scarcity like a quant
We can apply survival analysis – commonly used in trading system lifetime predictions – to these coin attrition patterns:
import pandas as pd
from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter
# Simulating war nickel survival rates
time_periods = [18, 15, 40] # Key phases in years
event_occurred = [1, 1, 1] # Attrition milestones
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
kmf.fit(time_periods, event_occurred)
kmf.plot_survival_function()
From coin dealers to dark pools
Here’s where it gets interesting for traders: markets consistently undervalue assets with “hidden friction.” For war nickels, it was the difficulty of extracting silver from manganese. In electronic trading, it’s securities with complex transaction costs. Both create temporary inefficiencies we can quantify.
The scarcity score – your new market lens
Try this simple factor to identify overlooked opportunities:
def calculate_scarcity(ticker):
historical_volume = get_30d_volume(ticker)
current_liquidity = get_order_book_depth(ticker)
friction_cost = estimate_transaction_friction(ticker)
return (historical_volume * friction_cost) / current_liquidity
Higher scores signal potential liquidity droughts – like finding a silver war nickel in a handful of change.
Seeing scarcity in real-time markets
During volatile openings, I watch for patterns reminiscent of those nickel survival curves. This indicator helps spot fleeting liquidity gaps:
Tracking order book pressure
import numpy as np
def liquidity_pulse(order_book, window=500):
mid_price = (order_book['ask'][0] + order_book['bid'][0]) / 2
pressure = []
for i in range(window):
imbalance = (order_book['bid_vol'][i] - order_book['ask_vol'][i]) / \
(order_book['bid_vol'][i] + order_book['ask_vol'][i])
pressure.append(imbalance)
scarcity_signal = np.exp(-np.std(pressure) * mid_price)
return scarcity_signal
Putting scarcity signals to work
When testing this approach, three parameters proved critical:
- Entry: Scarcity score > 2.5σ above mean
- Exit: Liquidity recovery to <0.5σ
- Size: Modified Kelly Criterion based on volatility
Simulated trading engine
for timestamp in market_hours:
current_scores = calculate_scarcity_scores()
signals = detect_scarcity_spikes(current_scores)
for signal in signals:
if not has_position(signal.ticker):
execute_order(signal.ticker, 'buy', size=kelly_size)
for position in open_positions:
if current_scores[position.ticker] < exit_target:
close_position(position.ticker)
Transaction costs - the modern refining challenge
War nickel dealers faced unexpected costs extracting silver. We face similar hidden expenses:
| Coin Challenge | Trading Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Separating silver from manganese | Multi-exchange routing fees |
| Variable silver content per coin | Slippage during volatile periods |
| Limited dealer interest | Shrinking liquidity provider rebates |
Building your own scarcity model
Here's how to implement these ideas:
Step 1: Gather alternative data
Track markets with natural scarcity - vintage bonds, rare metals, even trading cards
Step 2: Create meaningful features
- Supply attrition curves
- Transaction friction estimates
- Participant avoidance metrics
Step 3: Train predictive models
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingRegressor
scarcity_model = GradientBoostingRegressor()
scarcity_model.fit(training_data[['attrition_rate', 'friction_cost', 'avoidance']],
training_data['liquidity_gap'])
Turning coin insights into trading signals
Silver war nickels taught me three crucial lessons about algorithmic trading:
- Scarcity follows physics-like patterns we can model
- Market blind spots create persistent opportunities
- True costs often hide beneath surface metrics
By applying these principles, we can detect liquidity droughts before conventional systems react. Sometimes, the best trading edges come from studying how rare things become even rarer - whether in coin collections or order books.
Related Resources
You might also find these related articles helpful:
- How Source Code Analysis Expertise Can Build Your Career as a Tech Expert Witness - When Software Becomes Evidence: The Lucrative World of Tech Expert Witnessing When lawyers fight over software, they nee...
- The Silver Nickel Principle: How Technical Scarcity Drives Startup Valuations in VC Deals - Why Technical Prowess Fuels Outsized Returns in Startup Investing Let me tell you why I get excited when I see technical...
- How I Turned Jefferson Nickel Expertise into a $50k/year Online Course Business - From Coin Nerd to Six-Figure Educator: How Jefferson Nickels Built My Online Course Empire Six years ago, I never imagin...