The Crack-Out Game: Should You Resubmit Your 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar for a PCGS Crossover?

Sometimes the plastic holder is holding the coin back. Let’s talk about the risks and rewards of trying to upgrade this piece across grading services.

Every serious collector has been there. You’re staring at a coin in a holder — maybe it’s an old NGC slab, maybe it’s a PCGS holder from a decade ago — and something just doesn’t sit right. The coin looks better than the grade on the label. The surfaces tell a story that the plastic doesn’t do justice to. And that nagging question creeps in: What if I cracked it out and sent it in again?

This is the crack-out game. It’s one of the most debated, most misunderstood, and most potentially profitable — or costly — decisions in all of numismatics. And when it comes to a coin like the 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar — a piece that sits at the very foundation of American coinage — the stakes are even higher.

In this article, I’m going to walk you through everything I’ve learned over years of professional crack-out work. We’ll talk about NGC-to-PCGS crossovers specifically, how to identify genuinely undergraded coins, the real risks of cracking out, and whether a coin like this 1795 FH 50c is worth the gamble. Buckle up.

Why the 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar Matters

Before we get into the grading weeds, let’s take a moment to appreciate what we’re dealing with here. The 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar is not just another old coin. It’s a piece of American history struck in the very first years of the United States Mint. Designed by Robert Scot, the Flowing Hair design was used on half dollars in 1794 and 1795, making these among the earliest silver coins ever produced by the young republic.

Only about 300,000 half dollars were struck in 1795 across all varieties, and survivors in any grade are highly sought after. The coin features Liberty facing right with flowing hair on the obverse, and a small eagle surrounded by a wreath on the reverse. These were hand-struck on early screw presses, which means no two are exactly alike. Strike quality varies enormously, and that variation is at the heart of the grading debate.

When a forum member recently posted images of a 1795 FH 50c in an old green holder and asked the community, “What would you grade this?” — the responses ranged from G4 to VG10. That’s a massive spread for a coin that could be worth thousands of dollars more at one grade than another. And that spread is exactly what makes the crack-out game so tempting.

The Forum Grade Spread: What It Tells Us

Let’s look at what the community said about this particular coin. The opinions were all over the map:

• G4 — one collector called it the “low man on the totem pole”
• G6 — the most common response, with multiple collectors agreeing
• VG8 — several experienced collectors landed here
• VG10 — a few thought it was a strong VG

One astute collector noted: “The strike is weak which creates the appearance of uneven wear. I am thinking VG10.” This is a critical observation, and it gets to the heart of why early American silver is so difficult to grade — and why crack-outs can go either way.

“No where near strong enough for a FN12 yet so much better than GD04. (Although I wouldn’t be shocked if it was a VG10.)”

This comment perfectly captures the dilemma. The coin is clearly better than a G4, but is it a VG8 or a VG10? That two-grade difference could mean hundreds or even thousands of dollars in the current market for a 1795 half dollar.

Understanding the Crack-Out Process

So what exactly is a crack-out? In simple terms, it’s the process of removing a coin from its current grading holder — carefully, without damaging the coin — and resubmitting it to the same or a different grading service in hopes of receiving a higher grade.

There are two main types of crack-out attempts:

1. Regrading with the same service — You crack the coin out of an NGC holder and resubmit it to NGC, hoping a different grader sees it differently.
2. Crossover to a competing service — You crack the coin out of an NGC holder and submit it to PCGS (or vice versa), hoping the other service grades it higher.

In the case of this 1795 FH 50c, the coin is in an old green holder — which almost certainly means an older NGC slab. The green label holders were used by NGC in the 1980s and 1990s, and coins in those holders are frequently resubmitted because grading standards have evolved significantly since then.

Why Old Green Holders Are Prime Crack-Out Candidates

I’ve cracked out hundreds of coins from old green holders over the years, and here’s what I’ve learned: NGC’s grading standards from the 1980s and early 1990s were generally stricter than they are today, particularly on early American coinage. A coin that received a VG8 in 1990 might very well grade VG10 or even F12 by today’s standards.

But — and this is a big but — it’s not guaranteed. Grading is subjective, and there’s always the risk that the coin comes back with the same grade or even a lower one. That’s the gamble.

NGC to PCGS Crossovers: The Specific Challenge

Crossing over from NGC to PCGS is one of the most common crack-out strategies, and it’s also one of the most nuanced. Here’s why.

PCGS and NGC don’t always see eye to eye, especially on early American silver. In my experience, PCGS tends to be slightly more generous on strike quality for early halves, while NGC has historically been tougher on surface quality and marks. For a 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar — where weak strikes are the norm rather than the exception — this distinction matters enormously.

Here’s a breakdown of how the two services typically differ on early half dollars:

• Strike: PCGS often gives more credit for what the coin should look like given its era, while NGC tends to grade more on what’s actually visible.
• Surfaces: NGC can be harsher on old cleaning marks, hairlines, and porosity that are common on early silver. PCGS may be more forgiving if the overall eye appeal is strong.
• Color and toning: PCGS tends to reward attractive, original toning more than NGC does, which can make a difference in the final grade.
• Eye appeal: This is the wildcard. Both services claim to consider eye appeal, but in practice, PCGS seems to weight it more heavily on early coinage.

For this particular 1795 FH 50c, the weak strike is a key factor. If the coin has strong surfaces and good eye appeal despite the weak strike, PCGS might be more inclined to reward it with a higher grade than NGC gave it.

How to Identify a Genuinely Undergraded Coin

Not every coin in a holder is a good crack-out candidate. In fact, most aren’t. The key is learning to identify the coins that are truly undergraded — the ones where the plastic is genuinely holding them back.

Here’s my checklist for evaluating a potential crack-out candidate:

1. Holder age — Is the coin in an older holder? Standards change over time, and coins from 10, 20, or 30 years ago may not reflect current grading norms.
2. Grade distribution — If the forum community consistently grades the coin higher than the label, that’s a strong signal. In this case, most collectors said VG8 or VG10, which suggests the coin may be undergraded if it’s currently in a G6 holder.
3. Strike vs. wear — Is the apparent wear actually a weak strike? This is extremely common on early halves. A coin that looks worn might actually be weakly struck, and modern graders are (usually) better at making this distinction.
4. Surface quality — Are the surfaces clean and free of major detracting marks? If the coin has been cleaned, has heavy porosity, or has significant scratches, cracking it out is unlikely to help.
5. Eye appeal — Does the coin have that intangible “look” that makes you want to pick it up and stare at it? Eye appeal matters more than most collectors realize, and it’s often the difference between a successful and unsuccessful crack-out.
6. Market value differential — Is the grade jump worth the cost? Cracking out isn’t free. You’ll pay submission fees, shipping, insurance, and potentially a regrade fee. Make sure the potential upside justifies the expense.

The Weak Strike Problem on 1795 Half Dollars

Let me spend a moment on this because it’s so important for this specific coin. The 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar was struck on the Mint’s early screw press, which simply couldn’t deliver the same pressure and consistency as modern coinage technology. As a result, many 1795 halves show weakly struck details — particularly on Liberty’s hair, the eagle’s breast, and the leaf details on the reverse.

This creates a grading nightmare. A coin might have full VG detail on the obverse but a weakly struck reverse that makes it look more worn than it actually is. Graders have to distinguish between actual wear (metal that has been physically removed through circulation) and weak strike (metal that never fully flowed into the die recesses during minting).

The forum commenter who said “The strike is weak which creates the appearance of uneven wear” nailed it. This is exactly the kind of coin that might benefit from a crack-out, because a fresh set of eyes — particularly at PCGS, which tends to be more strike-forgiving on early coinage — might give the coin more credit for what it is rather than penalizing it for what it isn’t.

The Real Risks of Cracking Out

I’ve been doing this long enough to know that crack-outs don’t always go your way. Here are the risks you need to understand before you crack open that holder:

• Same grade or lower — The most common outcome, frankly. You might crack out a VG8 and get back a VG8. Or worse, a G6. Grading is subjective, and there’s no guarantee a different grader will see it your way.
• Damage during removal — If you’re not careful (or if you’re not experienced), you can scratch, ding, or otherwise damage the coin while removing it from the holder. This is especially risky on early silver, which is often softer than later coinage.
• Cost — Between submission fees, shipping, insurance, and the value of the coin being out of your possession for weeks or months, the cost of a crack-out attempt can easily run $100–$300 or more. If the coin doesn’t upgrade, that money is gone.
• Market timing — While your coin is at the grading service, you can’t sell it. If the market moves against you during that time, you could lose money even if the grade goes up.
• Population report impact — If the coin comes back with a lower grade, it’s now a lower-grade coin. You can’t un-ring that bell. The market will see it as a lower-grade piece, and that affects value.

When NOT to Crack Out

Based on my experience, here are the situations where I advise collectors to leave the coin in the holder:

• The coin is in a current-generation holder with a recent grade. Standards haven’t changed enough to justify the risk.
• The coin has known issues — cleaning, tooling, porosity, or other problems that are likely to be caught on resubmission.
• The value differential between grades is small. If a VG8 is worth $800 and a VG10 is worth $850, it’s not worth the risk.
• You’re emotionally attached to the coin and can’t handle the possibility of a lower grade. This is more common than you’d think, and it’s a valid reason to leave well enough alone.

The PCGS Crossover Strategy for Early Half Dollars

If you’ve decided to go ahead with an NGC-to-PCGS crossover on a 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar, here’s the strategy I recommend based on years of professional experience:

1. Submit at the right tier — Don’t waste money on the highest-tier submission unless the coin is worth it. For a VG-to-FN range 1795 half, the standard tier is usually sufficient.
2. Use the crossover service — PCGS offers a crossover service where you don’t have to crack the coin out yourself. They’ll evaluate it in the NGC holder and only crack it out if they believe it will meet or exceed the stated grade. This reduces your risk, though it limits your upside.
3. Set a minimum grade — When using the crossover service, set your minimum at the current grade or one grade higher. This way, if PCGS doesn’t think it will make the grade, they’ll send it back in the original holder and you’ve only lost the submission fee.
4. Consider the “plus” grade — PCGS awards “+” designations (like VG10+) for coins at the top of their grade. If your coin is a strong example, the plus designation can add significant value.
5. Time your submission — PCGS grading can be slower during peak periods (after major auctions, during the summer convention season). Submit during slower periods for faster turnaround.

What This Means for the 1795 FH 50c in Question

So, should the owner of this particular 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar crack it out and attempt a PCGS crossover? Let me weigh in with my professional opinion.

The fact that the coin is in an old green NGC holder is the first green light. Coins from that era of NGC grading are frequently undergraded by today’s standards, and the market knows it. There’s a reason old green holder coins command a premium when they cross over successfully.

The community grade spread is the second green light. When multiple experienced collectors independently grade a coin higher than its label, that’s a strong signal. The consensus seemed to be VG8 to VG10, which suggests the coin has real upgrade potential.

The weak strike issue is the third factor. Because the coin’s apparent wear is partly a function of strike rather than actual metal loss, there’s a reasonable chance that PCGS graders — who tend to be more forgiving of strike weakness on early coinage — will grade it higher.

However, I’d want to examine the coin in hand before making a final recommendation. The images suggest a solid, problem-free coin, but early silver can hide surprises — old cleaning, subtle hairlines, rim issues — that don’t show up well in photographs.

My advice? Consider the crossover route with a minimum grade set at the current NGC grade. This limits your downside while giving you the upside of a potential upgrade. If the coin is currently a G6 in the old green holder, there’s a reasonable chance it could come back as a VG8 or even VG10 from PCGS — and that grade jump could be worth significantly more than the cost of the attempt.

Final Thoughts: The Art and Science of the Crack-Out

The crack-out game is part art, part science, and part gambling. There’s no sure thing in this business — anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something. But with the right knowledge, the right expectations, and the right coin, a well-executed crack-out can be one of the most rewarding moves in numismatics.

The 1795 Flowing Hair Half Dollar is one of the most important coins in American numismatic history. It represents the very beginning of our nation’s coinage — a time when the United States Mint was finding its footing, experimenting with designs, and producing coins that would become the foundation of one of the world’s greatest collecting traditions. Whether this particular coin grades G6, VG8, or VG10, it’s a piece of history that deserves to be appreciated and preserved.

But if you’re sitting on one in an old holder and you think the plastic is holding it back? Do your homework. Study the coin. Get opinions from trusted collectors and dealers. And if the evidence points to an upgrade, take the calculated risk. That’s what the crack-out game is all about.

As always, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Have you ever cracked out a coin and gotten an upgrade? Or have you had a crack-out go wrong? Share your experiences in the comments below — the more we share, the better we all get at this fascinating aspect of the hobby.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• Inherited a Collection of Slabbed Coins? An Estate Liquidator’s Guide to Protecting Your Inheritance, Avoiding Scams, and Maximizing Value at Auction – So you inherited a coin collection. Maybe it was tucked into a closet, stacked in a safe, or displayed proudly in your l…
• The Currency Connection: Paper Money from the Era of the CSNS Show — National Bank Notes, Silver Certificates, and Matching Coin-and-Currency Sets – Coins never circulated in a vacuum. So let’s talk about the fascinating paper money that changed hands right along…
• How to Properly Store and Preserve Coins: Lessons from a Mysterious 1963-D Cent and the Dangers of PMD – I’ve seen too many valuable pieces ruined by improper cleaning or storage. Here is how to keep your coins safe for…