Design Evolution: The 1868 Two Cent Piece and Its Numismatic Lineage — What Came Before, What Came After, and Why It Still Matters

Coin designs don’t just materialize out of thin air — they evolve. They’re shaped by the hands of engravers, the mandates of Congress, the pressures of war, the shifting tides of public taste, and the slow march of artistic fashion across decades. As a numismatic artist, I’ve spent years studying not just individual coins but the conversations between types — the way one design borrows from, reacts to, and sets the stage for another. When I pick up a coin like the 1868 Two Cent piece, I don’t simply see a small copper disc with a shield on it. I see a midpoint in a living chain of artistic decisions stretching back to the earliest days of the U.S. Mint and forward into the Barber era and beyond.

Recently, a fellow collector named Zack shared his latest acquisition on a forum — a beautifully toned 1868 Two Cent piece with strong red color and truly outstanding eye appeal. The community responded warmly, praising its color, its stability, and its place in a type collection. But what struck me most about the thread was how few people commented on the design itself — its artistic ancestry, its place in the broader evolution of U.S. coinage, and the fascinating story of why this coin looks the way it does. That’s the story I want to tell here.

The Birth of the Two Cent Piece: A Coin Born from Crisis

To truly understand the 1868 Two Cent piece, you have to go back to 1864 — a year when the United States was deep in the throes of the Civil War. Small change had virtually disappeared from circulation. Citizens were using postage currency, encased postage stamps, and private tokens just to make everyday transactions. The Mint needed a solution, and it needed one fast.

The result was the Two Cent piece — the first U.S. coin ever to bear the motto “IN GOD WE TRUST”. That phrase would go on to appear on virtually every subsequent U.S. coin. James B. Longacre, the Mint’s Chief Engraver at the time, was tasked with creating the design. But Longacre didn’t start from scratch. He drew heavily on established motifs that had already proven themselves on earlier coinage.

Longacre’s Artistic Vocabulary: The Shield Motif

The obverse of the Two Cent piece features a heraldic shield — a vertical shield with a chief (the horizontal band at the top) bearing the national motto. This wasn’t an original invention. The shield design had deep roots in European heraldry and had already appeared on U.S. coinage in various forms. Longacre himself had used shield motifs on the 1859 Indian Head Cent (the reverse shield) and on gold coins like the $1 Gold Piece (Type 2 and Type 3). The shield was a symbol of national unity — a particularly potent message during the Civil War — and its use on the Two Cent piece was both a practical and a deeply patriotic choice.

What made Longacre’s shield on the Two Cent piece distinctive was its boldness. The shield is large, filling most of the obverse field, with clean, strong lines that were easy to strike and easy to read. The lettering is generous and well-spaced. Compared to earlier small cents and gold coins, the Two Cent piece had a sense of monumentality that belied its small size. This was entirely intentional. The coin needed to be trusted by a public that was deeply suspicious of base-metal currency. It needed to look authoritative, and it did.

The Wreath Reverse: A Familiar Friend

The reverse features a simple but elegant wreath of wheat, cotton, corn, and oak — representing the agricultural wealth of the nation. This wreath design was directly descended from the wreath on the 1859 Indian Head Cent reverse and echoed similar wreath motifs on contemporary silver coins. The denomination “2 CENTS” is prominently displayed within the wreath, and the legend “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” encircles the design.

As an artist, I find the reverse particularly interesting because it represents a genuine transitional moment. The wreath is naturalistic but simplified — a conscious move away from the overly detailed, almost fussy designs of the pre-war era toward something cleaner and more modern. This simplification would become a hallmark of later U.S. coinage, and you can see its seeds right here.

Design Continuity: The Two Cent Piece in Context (1864–1873)

The Two Cent piece was minted from 1864 to 1873, and over that decade, the design remained remarkably consistent. There are no major type changes within the series — no redesigns, no new portraits, no dramatic shifts in composition. That stability is itself a design statement. In a period of enormous national upheaval — the Civil War, Reconstruction, the assassination of Lincoln, the impeachment of Johnson — the Two Cent piece remained a constant, its shield and wreath unchanged.

But within that consistency, there are subtle variations that collectors prize:

• 1864 Large Motto vs. Small Motto: The earliest 1864 issues come in two varieties — the Large Motto (scarcer and considerably more valuable) and the Small Motto. The difference is in the size and spacing of the “IN GOD WE TRUST” letters on the obverse. The Large Motto is the earlier die state and is significantly rarer, especially in high grade. If you’re hunting for a key date in this series, this is the one that matters most.
• Die varieties and cracks: As one forum commenter noted, Zack’s 1868 piece appears to show a die crack on the reverse. Die cracks are common in the later years of the series as the Mint pushed its dies harder and longer. For specialists, these die states add another layer of collectibility and can significantly affect a coin’s numismatic value.
• Strike quality: The Two Cent piece is generally well-struck, but later dates (1868–1873) can show softer details as die wear accumulated. A sharply struck 1868, like Zack’s, commands a premium — the difference between a flat, lifeless example and one with crisp, full details is night and day.

The 1868 in Particular

The year 1868 falls right in the middle of the series’ production run. By this time, the initial panic-driven demand for small change had eased, and mintages were declining. The 1868 had a mintage of approximately 2,806,000 pieces — respectable but far below the massive 1864 mintage of nearly 20 million. This makes the 1868 a moderately scarce date in circulated grades, though it remains accessible in Mint State, particularly in brown and red-brown designations.

What makes Zack’s example special — and what the forum community immediately recognized — is the color. The coin displays significant original red color, which is the holy grail for copper collectors. PCGS and NGC use three-tier color designations for copper coins:

1. RD (Red): 85% or more original mint red. The most desirable and valuable designation — and the hardest to find.
2. RB (Red-Brown): Between 15% and 85% red. Attractive, collectible, and often the sweet spot for collectors who want color without the full RD premium.
3. BN (Brown): Less than 15% red. The most common designation, and perfectly collectible, but it won’t turn heads the way red copper does.

Zack’s coin, with its “lots of red” as one commenter enthusiastically noted, sits comfortably in the RB-to-RD range, making it a premium example. The TrueView image confirms strong, stable color with no signs of artificial treatment — a critical factor for buyers and sellers alike. Originality is everything in copper, and this coin has it in spades.

What Came Before: The Artistic Predecessors

Every coin design is a response to what came before it. The Two Cent piece didn’t emerge in a vacuum — it was the product of decades of experimentation with small-denomination U.S. coinage. Here are the key predecessors that shaped its design and gave it its distinctive character.

The Large Cent Era (1793–1857)

The earliest U.S. cents were large, heavy, and artistically ambitious. From the 1793 Chain Cent — widely criticized at the time for its unfortunate “chain of slavery” imagery — to the 1816 Matron Head and the 1839 Braided Hair designs, the Large Cent series was essentially a laboratory for American numismatic art. Each design reflected the aesthetic sensibilities of its era — from the neoclassical severity of the early Republic to the more naturalistic, romantic styles of the 1830s and 1840s.

By the 1850s, the Large Cent had become expensive to produce (copper prices were rising sharply) and increasingly unpopular with the public (it was heavy, cumbersome, and frankly just too big for everyday use). The Mint needed a smaller, lighter cent — and that urgent need gave birth to the Flying Eagle Cent in 1856.

The Flying Eagle Cent (1856–1858)

Designed by James B. Longacre — yes, the very same engraver who would later create the Two Cent piece — the Flying Eagle Cent was a radical departure. It was small, thin, and made of a copper-nickel alloy, a white metal that gave it a distinctive silvery appearance. The obverse featured a flying eagle, and the reverse featured a wreath similar in concept to what would later appear on the Two Cent piece.

But the Flying Eagle Cent had a serious problem: the high relief of the eagle’s head and the tail feathers on the reverse made it extremely difficult to strike. Dies broke quickly, and many surviving examples show weak, mushy details. The Mint needed a more practical design — something that could be struck reliably and consistently — and Longacre delivered.

The Indian Head Cent (1859–1909)

The 1859 Indian Head Cent was Longacre’s masterpiece of practical design. The obverse featured a stylized “Indian” head — actually modeled after Longacre’s own daughter wearing a feathered headdress, a fact that never fails to delight me as an artist — and the reverse featured a simple oak wreath with a shield at the top. That shield-on-the-reverse motif was the direct ancestor of the shield-on-the-obverse motif on the Two Cent piece. The lineage is unmistakable once you see it.

The Indian Head Cent was easy to strike, easy to read, and immediately popular with the public. It established the core design vocabulary — the shield, the wreath, the clean lettering — that Longacre would refine and expand on the Two Cent piece just five years later. If you want to understand where the Two Cent piece came from, start here.

What Came After: The Legacy of the Two Cent Piece

The Two Cent piece was discontinued in 1873 as part of the Coinage Act of 1873 — sometimes called the “Crime of ’73” by silver advocates. The act reorganized the Mint’s operations and eliminated several denominations, including the Two Cent piece, the Three Cent silver, and the half dime. The coin faded into relative obscurity for decades, surviving primarily in the collections of specialists and type set builders.

But its design legacy lived on. The shield motif that Longacre perfected on the Two Cent piece reappeared on the Shield Nickel (1866–1883), which shared the same basic obverse concept — a heraldic shield with “IN GOD WE TRUST” above. The Shield Nickel was even more difficult to strike than the Flying Eagle Cent (its hard nickel alloy was brutal on dies), but it carried the Two Cent piece’s design DNA well into the 1870s and 1880s.

Beyond the Shield Nickel, the broader design principles of the Two Cent piece — bold, simple, patriotic imagery; clear denomination; national motto — became the template for U.S. coinage well into the 20th century. When Charles Barber designed the Barber Dime, Quarter, and Half Dollar in the 1890s, he moved toward a more classical, Liberty-head aesthetic, but the underlying philosophy of clarity and legibility was fundamentally the same. The Two Cent piece helped establish that philosophy.

The Motto That Started It All

Perhaps the single most enduring legacy of the Two Cent piece is the motto “IN GOD WE TRUST.” First appearing on the 1864 Two Cent piece, the motto was added at the urging of Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who received numerous letters from citizens during the Civil War requesting that the nation’s coinage acknowledge God. The motto was so well-received that Congress eventually mandated its use on all coins large enough to bear it, and it has appeared on every U.S. coin since.

As someone who studies these designs for a living, I find this profoundly moving. A small, base-metal coin — worth just two cents, used to buy a newspaper or a piece of candy — became the vehicle for one of the most important phrases in American civic life. That’s the power of coin design. It’s never just about the metal or the denomination. It’s about the message.

Public Reaction: Then and Now

The Two Cent piece was genuinely well-received by the public when it was first introduced. After years of war tokens and fractional currency, Americans were hungry for real, government-issued small change. The coin’s patriotic design — the shield, the motto, the agricultural wreath — resonated deeply with a nation trying to heal itself. Contemporary newspapers praised both the coin’s appearance and its practical utility.

But as the 1870s approached, the Two Cent piece began to lose its purpose. The nickel three-cent piece and the Shield Nickel were handling small-change transactions efficiently, and the two-cent denomination increasingly felt redundant. When the Coinage Act of 1873 eliminated it, there was remarkably little public outcry. The coin simply… faded away.

Fast forward to the modern era, and the Two Cent piece has experienced a remarkable renaissance. Collectors like Zack recognize it as a beautiful, historically significant, and still remarkably affordable piece of American numismatic art. The forum thread I referenced is typical of the modern collecting community’s enthusiasm:

“LOTS of RD Zack — nice buy (& with a bean). CONGRATS!” — Ken

“Beautiful. Lots of red for R/B price. Looks stable and perfect for the grade.”

“That coin is worth having slabbed. Great pickup!”

The enthusiasm is remarkably consistent: collectors love the color, the eye appeal, and the historical significance. The only dissent came from one collector who prefers his copper brown — a perfectly valid aesthetic preference, and one that underscores the wonderfully subjective nature of color grading in copper coins. Beauty, as always, is in the eye of the beholder.

Actionable Takeaways for Buyers and Sellers

If you’re considering adding a Two Cent piece to your type collection — or if you already own one and are wondering about its value — here are my recommendations as someone who’s spent years studying and collecting these pieces.

For Buyers:

• Prioritize color and eye appeal above all else. A beautifully toned RB or RD example will always command a premium over a brown coin of the same technical grade. Zack’s coin is a perfect case study — it’s the color that transforms it from a common date into a truly special piece.
• Check for stability obsessively. Original, stable color is absolutely essential. Look for even toning with no spots, streaks, or signs of artificial treatment. A TrueView or high-quality photo is invaluable when buying sight-unseen. When in doubt, stick with certified examples.
• Consider slabbing seriously. As one commenter rightly noted, a coin like Zack’s is worth having professionally graded and slabbed. A PCGS or NGC holder adds credibility, protects the coin’s surfaces and patina, and makes it significantly easier to sell later.
• Know the key dates before you shop. The 1864 Large Motto is the undisputed series key — it’s the rare variety that anchors any serious collection. The 1873 (the final year) is also scarce. Dates like the 1868 are moderately available but can be surprisingly hard to find in full RD, so patience pays.
• Look for die varieties if you want to go deeper. Die cracks, repunched dates, and other varieties add another dimension to the series and can significantly enhance collectibility. The 1868 has several known die states that are well worth studying — it’s a rich field for the specialist collector.

For Sellers:

• Invest in excellent photography — it’s non-negotiable. The forum thread demonstrates this perfectly. Zack’s TrueView image immediately communicates the coin’s quality to anyone viewing it. High-quality photos don’t just sell coins; they sell them for more money.
• Get it slabbed if it merits it. A coin with strong color, good eye appeal, and no problems will benefit enormously from professional grading. The “bean” — the CAC sticker — that Zack’s coin carries adds a further premium and signals quality to knowledgeable buyers.
• Tell the story — provenance and history matter. Collectors love historical context, and it directly enhances perceived numismatic value. When listing a Two Cent piece, mention its role as the first “IN GOD WE TRUST” coin, its Civil War origins, and its design lineage. A coin with a story is always worth more than one without.

Conclusion: Why the 1868 Two Cent Piece Deserves Your Attention

The 1868 Two Cent piece is more than just a coin — it’s a chapter in the ongoing story of American numismatic art. It connects the Large Cent era to the Indian Head era to the Shield Nickel and beyond. It carries the first appearance of a motto that would define American coinage for generations. And in the hands of a collector like Zack, with its beautiful red color, original luster, and strong eye appeal, it’s a genuinely beautiful object worthy of any cabinet.

As a numismatic artist, I’m drawn to coins like this because they remind me that design is never static. Every coin is a link in a chain — influenced by what came before, influencing what comes after, and carrying within it the aesthetic values, political pressures, and cultural aspirations of its time. The Two Cent piece is a small coin with an outsized story, and it deserves a place in every serious type collection.

If you’re building a type set, don’t overlook the Two Cent piece. It’s affordable, historically rich, and — when you find a nice one, like Zack’s — genuinely stunning. The next time you hold one in your hand, take a moment to trace its artistic lineage. You’ll find yourself traveling back through the entire history of American coinage, from the shield to the wreath, from the Civil War to the present day. That’s the magic of this hobby, and that’s why I love what I do.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• The Dealer’s Edge: How to Profit from eBay Coin Arbitrage, Buy/Sell Spreads, and Smart Flipping Strategies – There’s real money to be made in the numismatic market — but only if you understand where the price gaps hide. Aft…
• The CAC Sticker Premium: How a Green or Gold Bean Can Double the Value of Your Mercury Dime – In today’s market, a tiny green or gold bean can completely transform a coin’s liquidity and price. Let&#821…
• The Buyer’s Mindset: Why Collectors Overpay and the Psychology Behind Numismatic Desire – What drives a collector to pay a massive premium for a tiny piece of metal? I’ve spent years studying the intersec…