The Crack-Out Game: Should You Resubmit NGC-Coins to PCGS Before the 22% Buyer’s Premium Eats Your Equity?

Sometimes the plastic holder is holding the coin back. Let’s talk about the risks and rewards of trying to upgrade a coin across grading services—and why the math has never been tighter.

As a professional crack-out artist—someone who has cracked thousands of coins out of third-party grading (TPG) holders to resubmit them for what we hope will be a higher grade—I can tell you that the calculus of when and whether to crack out a coin has gotten significantly more complicated. The recent surge in auction house buyer’s premiums, with Heritage Auctions (HA) now at 22% and Stacks Bowers quietly matching that rate starting April 1, has fundamentally reshaped the economics of the crack-out game.

When I’m evaluating whether to crack a coin out of an NGC holder and resubmit it to PCGS, I’m not just thinking about the grade. I’m thinking about the total cost of ownership, the auction venue where the coin will eventually sell, and how much of my profit margin will be consumed by premiums, fees, and market friction. In this article, I’ll walk you through exactly how I approach NGC-to-PCGS crossovers, regrading strategies, crack-out risks, and how to identify coins that are genuinely undergraded—and worth the gamble.

The New Math: Why 22% Changes Everything for Crack-Out Artists

Let me be blunt: the jump from 20% to 22% buyer’s premium at Heritage Auctions—and the matching increase at Stacks Bowers—is not just two percentage points. It represents a fundamental shift in how we must evaluate the return on investment for every crack-out attempt.

Consider the numbers. If you crack out an NGC MS-64 Morgan dollar and successfully cross it to PCGS MS-65, the value difference might be $500 versus $800—a $300 gross gain. But if you plan to sell that coin at auction, the buyer’s premium now eats into the buyer’s willingness to pay. Forum discussions have highlighted a troubling case: a Republic gold Proof “Empress Elisabeth” Medal (1/2 oz) sold for $2,001 at Heritage, which was 86% of its melt value of $2,313.24. Add the $440 buyer’s premium, and the buyer paid $2,441 for a coin worth $2,313 in gold. That’s not a numismatic premium—that’s a numismatic penalty.

For those of us in the crack-out game, this matters enormously because:

• The auction market sets the ceiling for what collectors will pay for a raw or newly slabbed coin. If the 22% premium suppresses hammer prices, the value differential between grades shrinks.
• Buyers are adjusting their bids downward to account for the premium, but as one forum member noted, uninformed bidders who ignore the fee and just keep pushing can create wildly unpredictable results.
• Sellers are receiving rebates on the buyer’s premium—sometimes up to 12%—but that still doesn’t fully offset the drag on final hammer prices.

My rule of thumb has always been that a crack-out attempt is only worth it if the expected value increase is at least 3x the total cost of the attempt (grading fees, shipping, insurance, and the risk of a lower grade). With the new premium environment, I’m raising that threshold to 4x. The margin for error has gotten far too thin.

NGC to PCGS Crossovers: The Professional’s Playbook

Let’s get into the specifics of what I look for when evaluating an NGC-graded coin for a potential crossover to PCGS. Not every coin deserves to be cracked out. In fact, the vast majority don’t. Here’s my systematic approach.

Step 1: Identify the Grade Spread Opportunity

PCGS and NGC do not grade identically. There are well-documented areas where PCGS tends to be stricter (certain modern issues, some proof series) and areas where they tend to be more lenient (certain Morgan dollar dates, early copper, and some gold type coins). I maintain a mental database—and a literal spreadsheet—of where the crossover opportunities are most favorable.

For example:

• Morgan Dollars: PCGS has historically been slightly more generous on certain common-date Morgans in the MS-64 to MS-65 range, particularly coins with blazing luster but minor bag marks that NGC might penalize more aggressively.
• Indian Head Cents: I’ve had consistent success crossing NGC AU-55 and AU-58 Indian Head cents to PCGS at the same grade or one notch higher, especially when the NGC holder has a scratch on the plastic that might have obscured a detail grade.
• Early Gold: This is where the crack-out game gets exciting. PCGS has a reputation for being slightly more favorable on certain early gold dates, particularly when it comes to color and originality. A coin in an NGC holder that shows exceptional original toning but received a “technical” grade can sometimes cross to PCGS with a far more favorable assessment.

Step 2: Examine the Coin, Not the Label

This is where my years of experience come into play. When I examine a coin for potential crossover, I’m looking at the actual coin—not the grade on the label. Specifically:

1. Luster: Does the coin have the cartwheel, the frost, the original mint bloom that PCGS graders reward? NGC and PCGS both value luster, but they weight it differently depending on the series. In mint condition, luster is often the single most important factor separating one grade from the next.
2. Strike: Is the strike full for the date and mint? Weak strikes are penalized by both services, but PCGS can be slightly more forgiving on certain dates where a weak strike is the norm. A bold, well-defined strike can tip the scales in your favor.
3. Surface Preservation: Are there hairlines, marks, or other detractions? I use a 10x loupe and a 16x binocular microscope. Hairlines that are visible under 16x but not 10x are the crack-out artist’s best friend—they may have been missed by NGC but could be caught by PCGS, or vice versa.
4. Eye Appeal: This is the most subjective factor, but it’s the one that drives auction prices more than any other. A coin with exceptional eye appeal—attractive patina, strong luster, clean surfaces—will command a premium at auction regardless of the numeric grade. If the coin in the NGC holder has eye appeal that the grade doesn’t reflect, that’s a crack-out candidate.

Step 3: Check the Pop Report and Price Guide

Before I crack anything, I pull the PCGS Population Report and the PCGS Price Guide. I want to know:

• How many examples exist at the current NGC grade versus the target PCGS grade?
• What is the price differential between the two grades?
• Is the price differential large enough to justify the risk?

As one forum member astutely observed, the market for great material seems to be holding steady even at the new premium levels. But the market for generic material—common-date coins in mid-grades, run-of-the-mill bullion pieces—is being squeezed hard. If you’re cracking out a generic coin where the grade spread is small, the 22% buyer’s premium environment makes the math much less favorable.

Step 4: Evaluate the Holder Condition

This is an often-overlooked factor. If the NGC holder is scratched, cloudy, or has a damaged label, the coin may not be presenting itself at its best. Cracking it out and resubmitting it in a fresh PCGS holder can sometimes result in a better grade simply because the graders can see the coin more clearly. I’ve personally seen coins gain a full point when the only variable that changed was the clarity of the holder.

Regrading vs. Crossover: Two Different Games

It’s important to distinguish between regrading (submitting a coin to the same service for a second opinion) and crossovers (submitting a coin from one service to another). Each has its own risk-reward profile.

Regrading: The Lower-Risk Option

Regrading with the same service is generally lower risk because you already know how that service tends to grade your type of coin. PCGS offers a “regrade” service where you can submit a coin they’ve already graded for a second look. The risk is that the grade could go down, but in my experience, regrades with the same service tend to be stable—the graders have institutional memory and are reluctant to downgrade their own work.

Crossovers: The Higher-Risk, Higher-Reward Option

Crossovers are where the real money is made—and lost. When you crack a coin out of an NGC holder and submit it to PCGS, you’re essentially asking PCGS to render a completely independent opinion. There’s no institutional bias to maintain the NGC grade. The coin gets a fresh look, and sometimes that fresh look is much more favorable.

But here’s the risk: it can also be much less favorable. I’ve cracked coins out of NGC holders where the coin looked like a solid MS-65, only to receive an MS-64 from PCGS. That’s a costly lesson. The key is to only attempt crossovers when you have high confidence in the coin’s quality and when the grade spread opportunity is well-documented.

The Crack-Out Process: A Professional’s Walkthrough

For those who are new to the crack-out game, let me walk you through the physical process. This is not something to do casually or carelessly. A single slip can destroy hundreds or thousands of dollars in numismatic value.

Tools of the Trade

• Heavy-duty gloves (cut-resistant, not cotton)
• Safety glasses (non-negotiable—plastic shards can fly)
• A sturdy work surface
• A thin, flat tool (I use a specialized coin crack-out tool, but a thin flathead screwdriver works in a pinch)
• A soft cloth or pad to protect the coin
• A magnifying loupe to inspect the coin after removal

The Technique

1. Inspect the holder. Look for any existing cracks or weak points. Some holders are easier to open than others. NGC’s older holders (the “fat” ones) are generally easier to crack than their newer, more secure designs.
2. Identify the seam. Every slab has a seam where the two halves are ultrasonically welded together. Find it.
3. Apply pressure at the seam. Using your flat tool, apply steady, even pressure at the seam. Don’t twist or pry—that’s how coins get damaged. Apply pressure until the weld gives way.
4. Open the holder. Once the weld is broken, carefully separate the two halves. The coin should be resting in the inner capsule.
5. Remove the coin. Gently push the coin out of the inner capsule. Handle it by the edges only.
6. Inspect the coin. Under magnification, check for any new marks, hairlines, or damage that may have occurred during the crack-out process. If the coin is damaged, the entire exercise was pointless.
7. Package for resubmission. Place the coin in a fresh flip or capsule and submit it to the target grading service.

Identifying Undergraded Coins: The Art and Science

The single most important skill in the crack-out game is the ability to identify coins that are genuinely undergraded—coins that deserve a higher grade than the one they currently carry. This is where experience, pattern recognition, and market knowledge all come together.

Red Flags That Suggest a Coin May Be Undergraded

After examining tens of thousands of coins, I’ve developed a checklist of red flags that suggest a coin might be a crack-out candidate:

• The coin has exceptional luster but a mediocre grade. Luster is the single most important factor in grading Mint State coins. If a coin has blazing, original mint luster but is graded MS-63, there’s a good chance it’s undergraded. NGC in particular has been known to penalize coins for minor contact marks while undervaluing luster.
• The coin is in a series known for conservative grading at the current service. As I mentioned above, certain series and dates are known to be graded more conservatively by NGC than by PCGS, or vice versa. Know these patterns.
• The holder is old. Grading standards evolve over time. A coin graded by NGC in the 1990s might receive a different grade if submitted today. This is especially true for series where standards have tightened (like early copper) or loosened (like certain modern proofs).
• The coin has attractive toning that isn’t reflected in the grade. Both PCGS and NGC claim to grade based on technical merit, not eye appeal. But in practice, beautiful, original patina can influence a grader’s perception. A coin with stunning, original rainbow toning might receive a “technical” grade that doesn’t reflect its true market value or collectibility.
• The coin is from a known conservative grader. Both NGC and PCGS employ multiple graders, and some are known to be more conservative than others. If you can identify which grader handled your coin (sometimes possible through subtle patterns in the grading), you can make a more informed crack-out decision.

The “White Whale” Factor

One forum member shared a story about almost missing a rare variety—a true “White Whale”—because they forgot to factor in the buyer’s premium during a live auction. They got the coin, but at more than they wanted to pay. This is a perfect illustration of the psychological pressure that high buyer’s premiums create—and why the crack-out game can be so profitable.

When collectors are paying 22% on top of hammer prices, they’re looking for coins that stand out. They’re looking for coins with exceptional eye appeal, coins that are undergraded, coins that represent genuine value. If you can identify those coins, crack them out, and get them into a PCGS holder at a higher grade, you’re offering collectors exactly what they’re looking for—and you’re doing it at a price point that accounts for the premium environment.

The Tax and Cost Basis Implications

One often-overlooked aspect of the crack-out game is the tax and cost basis implications. As one forum member noted, “For those that track cost basis for tax purposes, you add commission and buyer’s premium to your cost basis.” This is critically important.

When you buy a coin at auction, your cost basis isn’t just the hammer price—it’s the hammer price plus the buyer’s premium plus any shipping, insurance, and other fees. This means that if you buy a coin for $1,000 hammer plus $220 buyer’s premium, your cost basis is $1,220. When you eventually sell that coin, your capital gain (or loss) is calculated from that $1,220 basis.

For crack-out artists, this has a subtle but important implication: if you’re buying coins at auction to crack out and resubmit, the buyer’s premium is part of your investment. You need to factor it into your ROI calculations. In a 22% premium environment, that’s a bigger number than it used to be.

One forum member also pointed out that “long term capital losses on collectibles mean you do not pay gains taxes. Beyond that, they are not deductible for collectors, only ‘investors’ and dealers.” This is a nuanced area of tax law, and I always recommend consulting a tax professional. But the key takeaway is that the crack-out game has tax implications that can affect your net return.

When NOT to Crack Out: The Professional’s Restraint

Knowing when NOT to crack out a coin is just as important as knowing when to do it. Here are the situations where I leave the coin in its current holder:

• The coin is already at the top of its grade range. If an NGC MS-65 coin looks like a solid MS-65—not a borderline MS-66—the risk of a downgrade outweighs the potential reward.
• The price spread between grades is small. If an NGC MS-64 is worth $500 and an NGC MS-65 is worth $550, there’s no point in cracking out. The potential $50 gain doesn’t justify the risk and cost.
• The coin is in a series where NGC and PCGS grades are equivalent. For some modern series, the two services grade so similarly that crossovers are pointless.
• The holder is in poor condition but the coin is common. If a common-date Morgan dollar is in a scratched NGC holder, it’s not worth the cost of cracking it out and resubmitting it. The holder condition doesn’t affect the numismatic value enough to justify the expense.
• You need the coin for a registry set. If you’re building a PCGS registry set, you need PCGS-graded coins. But if you’re building an NGC registry set, don’t crack out your NGC coins just because you think they might grade higher at PCGS. The provenance and consistency of the set matter.

The Future of the Crack-Out Game

As buyer’s premiums continue to climb—and several forum members predicted they’ll reach 25% or even 50% in the coming years—the crack-out game will become both more important and more challenging.

It will be more important because collectors will increasingly seek out coins that offer genuine value—coins that are undergraded, coins with exceptional eye appeal, coins that represent a bargain relative to their quality. The crack-out artist who can identify and upgrade these coins will be providing a valuable service to the market.

It will be more challenging because the margin for error will continue to shrink. Every crack-out attempt costs money (grading fees, shipping, insurance), and every failed attempt eats into your profit. In a 22% or 25% premium environment, the grade spreads need to be larger to justify the risk.

One forum member suggested that “private party may be the way to go on some coins so you don’t sell for 22% back on bidders’ adjusted bids.” This is excellent advice. If you can sell your upgraded coins directly to collectors or dealers—bypassing the auction house entirely—you avoid the buyer’s premium altogether. This is increasingly my preferred strategy for mid-range coins that don’t need the marketing power of a major auction house.

Conclusion: The Plastic Is Just the Beginning

The crack-out game is not for the faint of heart. It requires deep knowledge of grading standards, a keen eye for quality, the physical skill to remove a coin from its holder without damaging it, and the financial discipline to know when the math doesn’t work.

In the current environment of rising buyer’s premiums, the crack-out game has become more complex but also more rewarding for those who do it well. The 22% premium at Heritage Auctions and Stacks Bowers is changing the economics of every transaction in the numismatic market, from the auction floor to the private sale. As a professional crack-out artist, I’m adapting my strategies accordingly—being more selective about which coins I crack out, more rigorous in my pre-submission analysis, and more creative in how I bring upgraded coins to market.

The plastic holder is just the beginning. It’s a snapshot of a coin’s quality at a single point in time, rendered by a single set of graders, under a single set of lighting conditions. The coin itself—its luster, its strike, its surfaces, its eye appeal—is the true measure of its worth. If the holder isn’t doing justice to the coin, it might be time to crack it out and let the coin speak for itself.

But do the math first. Always do the math first.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• The Arbitrage Guide: Flipping Lafayette Dollars — How Dealers Exploit Buy/Sell Spreads, Cross-Grading, and Raw-to-Slab Opportunities on a Classic Commemorative Dollar – There’s serious money to be made in the numismatic market — if you know where the price gaps are. I’ve spent…
• The Science of the Strike: A Metallurgical Breakdown of the 1974-D Kennedy Half Dollar and the Doubled Die Question – The way a coin ages, tones, and wears is entirely dependent on its metal alloy. Here is a scientific breakdown of this p…
• Early vs. Late Die State: Evaluating Strike, Die Wear, and Color Premiums on 1934 Silver Dollars – Which One Would You Buy? – A coin struck from a fresh die looks completely different than one struck from a dying one. Let’s look at the die …