Trading the Gold-to-Silver Ratio: What the “Scam Bliss Coin Press” Teaches Us About Precious Metal Strategy

Smart stackers don’t just hold — they trade the ratios. Here’s how this obscure piece of minting history fits into a broader precious metal strategy, and why I believe every serious collector should care.

When most people think about the gold-to-silver ratio, they picture a simple calculation: divide gold’s spot price by silver’s and watch the number bounce around. Clean. Abstract. But as someone who has spent decades navigating the intersection of numismatics and commodities markets, I can tell you the story runs far deeper than any spreadsheet. Hidden in the archives of the United States Mint — in retired die certificates, in departmental acronyms that even veteran collectors have never encountered, in the mechanical history of coin presses — there are lessons about value, scarcity, and the relationship between gold and silver that can sharpen any stacker’s edge.

The forum thread that inspired this piece began with a deceptively simple question: “What is a ‘Scam’ Bliss Coin Press?” What unfolded was a masterclass in historical detective work — one that ultimately leads us right back to the precious metal ratio and why understanding the mechanics of minting matters to anyone trading gold against silver today.

The Gold-to-Silver Ratio: A Trader’s Foundation

Before we get into coin presses and departmental acronyms, let me lay the groundwork for why this matters from a trading perspective. The gold-to-silver ratio measures how many ounces of silver it takes to buy one ounce of gold. It is one of the oldest continuously tracked financial ratios in human civilization — recorded in some form since ancient Egypt.

Here are the key benchmarks every trader should have committed to memory:

• Historical average (20th century): Approximately 47:1
• Modern average (1970–present): Approximately 68:1
• Extreme highs: The ratio spiked above 120:1 during the COVID-19 market shock in March 2020 and reached similar extremes during the 1990s dot-com boom.
• Extreme lows: It dropped to roughly 16:1 in 1980 during the Hunt brothers’ silver squeeze, and to about 32:1 in 2011 during the post-financial-crisis precious metals rally.
• Ancient and early modern norms: For most of recorded history, the ratio hovered between 10:1 and 15:1, reflecting the natural abundance ratio of silver to gold in the Earth’s crust.

I use these extremes as signals. When the ratio climbs above 80:1, I start looking at swapping gold holdings into silver. When it drops below 40:1, I consider the reverse. The strategy is simple in theory — but it demands patience, conviction, and a deep understanding of what actually drives the ratio.

One of those drivers, surprisingly enough, is the physical production of coins themselves. And that brings us to the Bliss press.

Decoding “SCAM”: The Special Coins and Metals Department

The thread began when a collector named Pete2226 was maintaining a spreadsheet tracking Certificates of Authenticity from the US Mint for retired dies. Among nearly 300 listings, he found only two certificates referencing a “Scam” Bliss Press. The term was unfamiliar to even the most seasoned collectors in the discussion — one participant who had bought and sold 600 to 700 defaced US Mint canceled dies said he had never encountered it.

The answer came from numismatic researcher Roger Burdette, author of A Guide Book of Peace Dollars:

“Special Coins and Metals department; Bliss Munitions Equipment Co. cartridge press reconfigured for striking coins. A surplus vertical one (a cupping press) was used to make the 1964-D Peace Dollars.”

SCAM = Special Coins and Metals. The acronym refers not to any fraud, but to an internal department within the US Mint responsible for producing numismatic-quality coins, medals, and special issues — as opposed to the high-volume circulation coinage churned out on modern Schuler and Grabener presses.

Why “Metals” vs. “Medals” Matters

An interesting sub-thread developed around whether the correct expansion was “Special Coins and Metals” or “Special Coins and Medals.” Pete2226’s research into Mint Annual Reports from the 1970s and 1980s found numerous references to a “Special Coins and Medals Program” beginning in 1979, with the last mention in 2014. But no documentation surfaced using the word “Metals” in that phrase.

The likely explanation? Oral tradition and typographical drift. As one participant noted, whichever word was wrong probably got copied repeatedly in Mint documents over the years. Burdette’s source — information obtained directly from the head of manufacturing at the US Mint — gives “Metals” strong provenance, but the documentary record favors “Medals.” For our purposes, the key takeaway is that both words point to the same functional reality: a specialized unit handling non-circulating, premium coinage and related products.

The 1964-D Peace Dollar Connection

This is where the story becomes directly relevant to precious metal traders. The SCAM Bliss Press was used to strike the legendary 1964-D Peace Dollars — coins produced at the Denver Mint but never officially released into circulation. Under the law at the time, all 1964-dated coins were supposed to have been struck before December 31, 1964, and the Peace dollar denomination had been discontinued back in 1935. The 1964-D Peace Dollars were produced in early 1965 under controversial circumstances, and virtually all were subsequently melted.

The 1964-D Peace Dollar is struck in 90% silver. It is one of the most famous rarities in American numismatics. If any examples survived the melting, they would command a fortune — not merely for their numismatic premium, but because they represent a specific, documented quantity of silver that was removed from the market by government action.

From a commodities perspective, this is significant. Every time the US Mint produces a silver coin, it creates demand for physical silver. When it melts coins, it returns that silver to the supply side. The 1964-D Peace Dollar episode represents a permanent withdrawal of silver from circulation — a supply shock, in trader’s terms. Understanding these historical episodes helps us appreciate how government monetary policy has repeatedly influenced the gold-to-silver ratio over the decades.

Numismatic Premiums vs. Spot Price: The Trader’s Dilemma

Here is where the collector and the commodities trader often find themselves at cross-purposes. When you buy a silver coin, you are paying spot price plus a premium. That premium covers minting costs, dealer markup, and — in the case of numismatic coins — a scarcity premium that can be many multiples of the metal’s melt value.

Let me break this down with a practical example:

1. A generic silver round (1 oz): Spot price plus a $2–$4 premium. This is the most efficient way to stack silver by weight.
2. A circulated Morgan Dollar (90% silver, ~0.7734 oz ASW): Spot value of the silver content plus a $5–$15 premium for the numismatic form factor. In poor condition, the premium over melt is modest.
3. A Mint State Morgan Dollar (MS-63): Spot value plus a $30–$60 premium. The numismatic premium now exceeds the metal value for common dates.
4. A key-date Morgan Dollar (e.g., 1893-S in MS-63): Spot value plus a $15,000+ premium. The numismatic premium is the entire story — the silver content is almost irrelevant.

For the ratio trader, this creates an important consideration. When the gold-to-silver ratio is extremely high — say, above 80:1 — silver is cheap relative to gold. This is when you want to accumulate physical silver. But which silver? The answer depends on your time horizon and risk tolerance.

If you are trading the ratio for profit: Buy generic silver rounds or bars. Minimize premiums so that when you swap back into gold, you capture the maximum spread. Numismatic premiums are a drag on ratio trades because they are asymmetric — you pay them going in and may not recover them going out, especially under pressure.

If you are stacking for the long term: Numismatic silver coins offer insurance against confiscation risk. Historically, the US government has exempted collectible coins from confiscation orders while requiring the surrender of bullion. These coins also carry scarcity premiums that can appreciate independently of spot prices. A Morgan Dollar in mint condition will always be worth more than its melt value, regardless of where silver trades.

The Bliss Press as a Metaphor for Market Structure

I find the Bliss press story useful as a metaphor for how precious metals markets actually work. The US Mint’s main production lines in the 2000s, as described by a COINage Magazine editor who toured the Philadelphia Mint in 2009, used rows of modern sideways-striking German presses co-mingling the output of multiple die pairs onto common conveyor systems. You could not attribute any specific coin to any specific die pair. This is the world of commodity-grade coinage — interchangeable, uniform, efficient.

Against one wall stood a single old vertical press — likely a Bliss — used for small jobs: mint set half dollars, special issues, proof pieces. This press struck coins one pair of dies at a time, with each coin individually attributable. This is the world of numismatic coinage — differentiated, traceable, premium.

The precious metals market operates the same way. On one side, you have the commodity market: COMEX futures, LBMA bars, generic rounds. On the other, the numismatic market: graded coins, key dates, proof issues with genuine eye appeal. The ratio between these two markets — the premium that collectors pay over spot — is itself a kind of ratio, one that expands and contracts based on economic conditions, collector demand, and precious metals prices.

When gold and silver prices rise sharply, numismatic premiums often contract as a percentage of total value. A coin that was worth $100 when silver was $15/oz (with $85 in numismatic premium) might be worth $150 when silver hits $30/oz (with only $65 in numismatic premium relative to the new spot value). That compression creates buying opportunities for collectors. Conversely, when metals prices crash, numismatic premiums often expand as a percentage because the floor value of the coin is supported by collector demand even when spot prices fall. A rare variety with strong provenance and original luster will hold its ground long after generic bullion has surrendered its gains.

Historical Ratio Trading: Lessons from the Mint

The history of US coinage is, in many ways, a history of the gold-to-silver ratio in action. The Coinage Act of 1792 established a legal ratio of 15:1 — meaning the mint was required to accept silver and gold at a fixed rate of 15 ounces of silver to 1 ounce of gold. This ratio was set based on the market conditions of the time, but it quickly became misaligned with global markets where the ratio was closer to 15.5:1 or 16:1.

The result? Gresham’s Law in action. The undervalued metal — gold, in this case — was hoarded or exported, while the overvalued metal, silver, flooded into the mint for coinage. By 1834, Congress adjusted the ratio to 16:1, which overvalued gold and drove silver out of circulation. This cycle repeated throughout the 19th century, with the Bland-Allison Act of 1878 and the Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890 representing political attempts to manage the ratio through government silver purchases.

What does this teach the modern ratio trader?

• Government policy can distort the ratio for extended periods, but market forces eventually prevail.
• Supply interventions — like the massive silver purchases mandated by the Sherman Act, or the melting of 1964-D Peace Dollars — create lasting impacts on the physical market.
• The ratio mean-reverts. It may take years or even decades, but extreme readings tend to correct. The trader who understands this has a powerful edge.

Swapping Metals: A Practical Framework

Based on my experience trading the gold-to-silver ratio over multiple market cycles, here is the framework I recommend.

When to Swap Gold into Silver

1. The ratio exceeds 80:1. This has historically been a zone where silver is significantly undervalued relative to gold.
2. Physical silver premiums are low or normal. If you are paying $5–$6 over spot for generic silver, the entry cost is reasonable. If premiums spike to $8–$10 over spot — as they did in 2020 — wait for normalization.
3. You have a 2–3 year time horizon. Ratio mean-reversion can be slow. Do not trade the ratio with money you need next month.
4. You prefer government-minted coins for liquidity. American Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs, and Austrian Philharmonikers are recognized worldwide and carry lower premiums than private rounds.

When to Swap Silver into Gold

1. The ratio drops below 40:1. This is rare but signals that gold is relatively cheap.
2. Silver numismatic premiums are compressed. If you own numismatic silver and the premiums have shrunk as a percentage of total value — because spot prices have risen dramatically — this may be a good time to realize the numismatic value and move into gold.
3. You are concerned about industrial demand destruction. Silver has significant industrial applications: electronics, solar panels, medical devices. In a severe recession, industrial demand for silver can fall, widening the ratio. Gold, with minimal industrial use, is more resilient in downturns.
4. You want to reduce storage volume. Gold’s higher value-to-weight ratio means less physical space for the same dollar amount.

The Numismatic Wild Card

There is a third option that most commodity traders overlook: swapping between numismatic and bullion positions within the same metal. When the ratio is high and silver spot prices are low, you can sometimes buy numismatic silver coins at modest premiums because collector demand is also depressed. Later, when metals prices rise and collector enthusiasm returns, those same coins appreciate in both their metal value and their numismatic premium. That double benefit is something pure bullion simply cannot offer.

The Bliss press story illustrates this perfectly. A 1964-D Peace Dollar — if one were to surface — would be worth not just the spot value of its 0.7734 ounces of silver, but potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars in numismatic value. The “SCAM” designation on the die certificate is a reminder that the most valuable coins are often those produced in the smallest quantities, under the most unusual circumstances, by the most specialized equipment. Original strike quality, untouched patina, documented provenance — these are the details that transform a piece of metal into a treasure.

FOIA Requests and Market Transparency

One final lesson from the forum thread: information asymmetry is real, and reducing it can be profitable. Several participants discussed filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the US Mint to obtain documentation about die production, press usage, and departmental organization. Pete2226’s spreadsheet of nearly 300 Certificates of Authenticity represents years of painstaking research that gives him a genuine informational edge in the numismatic market.

The same principle applies to precious metals trading. The more you understand about supply chains, mint production schedules, government stockpiles, and industrial demand patterns, the better positioned you are to anticipate ratio movements. Key resources include:

• US Mint Annual Reports: Production figures by denomination and metal.
• COMEX warehouse stocks: Physical inventories of gold and silver held in exchange-approved vaults.
• LBMA clearing data: Daily clearing volumes for London gold and silver markets.
• USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries: Annual reports on gold and silver mine production, reserves, and industrial consumption.
• COT (Commitments of Traders) reports: Weekly data on the positioning of commercial and non-commercial traders in gold and silver futures.

Conclusion: The Coin Press and the Ratio

The “Scam Bliss Coin Press” is more than a numismatic curiosity. It is a window into the machinery — both literal and figurative — that connects precious metals to the coins we collect and trade. The SCAM acronym reminds us that behind every coin is a production decision, a departmental structure, a choice about which metal to use and how to use it. Those decisions, multiplied across centuries of minting history, have shaped the supply of gold and silver coins in circulation today — and therefore the premiums that collectors and traders pay.

For the ratio trader, the lesson is this: never treat gold and silver as abstract numbers on a screen. They are physical metals, struck into coins by real presses, in real facilities, by real people making real decisions. The Bliss press standing against the wall of the Philadelphia Mint, quietly striking half dollars for mint sets while the modern Schuler presses roared in the background — that is a perfect image for the relationship between numismatic and commodity value. One is loud, efficient, and interchangeable. The other is quiet, specialized, and unique. Both matter. Both have value. And the ratio between them — whether measured in ounces or in premiums — is where the smart money finds its edge.

So the next time you calculate the gold-to-silver ratio and consider a swap, remember the SCAM Bliss press. Remember the 1964-D Peace Dollars that were struck and then melted. Remember that every ounce of gold and silver in your portfolio has a history — and that understanding that history is what separates the smart stackers from the rest.

Related Resources

You might also find these related articles helpful:

• How to Maximize Profits Selling a Bolivia 1867 FE 1 Boliviano “REPUBLICA BOLIVIANO” 11 Stars — NGC MS64 Finest Known at Auction – There is a massive difference between selling on eBay and consigning to a major auction house. Let’s look at how t…
• The Hidden History Behind High-Stakes Numismatics: French Patterns, Essais, and the Pillet Legacy – Every relic tells a story. To truly understand what’s sitting in my collection — or yours — we have to look at the…
• Will a CAC Sticker Double the Value of Your Peace Dollar? Decoding the Premium for the 1921 Peace Dollar – In today’s market, a small green or gold sticker can drastically change a coin’s liquidity and price. Let&#8…